- View New Content
- Home
- Site
-
Forums
- Community Resources
- FileMaker Security Management
- FileMaker Server Administration
- FileMaker on the GO
- Database Schema & Business Logic
- The Presentation Layer
- Brain Food
-
FileMaker and WEB 2.0 Technology
- 360 Works Official Product Support Forums
- FM Forums Affiliate Sponsors
- FileMaker Developers & User Groups
- Tools Of The Trade
- FileMaker Classifieds
- FileMaker Product Family
- The Water Cooler
- FM Forums Operations
- Blogs
- Social Groups
- Marketplace
- Chat
-
More
Filtering a field for text files only
Started by K1200, Feb 25 2012 10:56 AM
15 replies to this topic
#1
old hand
Posted 25 February 2012 - 10:56 AM
I'm populating a value list from a field containing all the file names in a directory (hundreds of values). I need to filter it to only show files with a .txt or .TXT extension. I can do it using a loop in a script, but I'm hoping someone can point out a simple calculation technique.
BTW, I've looked at a couple of functions on BrianDunning.com and found them too involved for this simple case. Others may eventually look at my code! Plus, I'd generally like to know how to filter fields for other reasons.
Thanks for any help.
BTW, I've looked at a couple of functions on BrianDunning.com and found them too involved for this simple case. Others may eventually look at my code! Plus, I'd generally like to know how to filter fields for other reasons.
Thanks for any help.
#2
ChindoguMaker
Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:16 AM
hundreds of values in a field ( 1 record ) or a value for each record ?
Daniele
--------------------------------
I'm sorry for my English
--------------------------------
I'm sorry for my English
#3
old hand
Posted 25 February 2012 - 11:27 AM
Hundreds of file names in a single field ... each one a value ... as returned by a plug-in's list folder function.
#4
ChindoguMaker
Posted 25 February 2012 - 01:05 PM
Using CustomList ( )* by Agnes Barouh, the calculation will be as simple as:
CustomList ( 1 ; ValueCount ( text ) ;
"If ( Right ( GetValue ( text ; [n] ) ; 4 ) = \".txt\" ; GetValue ( text ; [n] ) )"
)
* http://www.briandunning.com/cf/868
You could even try to use recursion with an unstored calculation field ( name it "result" ), looping with itself.
Let([
T = yourTextField ;
$i_InnerRecursion = $i_InnerRecursion + 1
];
Case(
Right ( GetValue ( T ; $i_InnerRecursion ) ; 4 ) = ".txt" and $i_InnerRecursion ≤ ValueCount ( T ) ; List ( GetValue ( T ; $i_InnerRecursion ) ; result ) ;
$i_InnerRecursion ≤ ValueCount ( T ) ; result ;
Let ( $i_InnerRecursion = "" ; "" )
)
)
CustomList ( 1 ; ValueCount ( text ) ;
"If ( Right ( GetValue ( text ; [n] ) ; 4 ) = \".txt\" ; GetValue ( text ; [n] ) )"
)
* http://www.briandunning.com/cf/868
You could even try to use recursion with an unstored calculation field ( name it "result" ), looping with itself.
Let([
T = yourTextField ;
$i_InnerRecursion = $i_InnerRecursion + 1
];
Case(
Right ( GetValue ( T ; $i_InnerRecursion ) ; 4 ) = ".txt" and $i_InnerRecursion ≤ ValueCount ( T ) ; List ( GetValue ( T ; $i_InnerRecursion ) ; result ) ;
$i_InnerRecursion ≤ ValueCount ( T ) ; result ;
Let ( $i_InnerRecursion = "" ; "" )
)
)
Daniele
--------------------------------
I'm sorry for my English
--------------------------------
I'm sorry for my English
#5
consultant
Posted 25 February 2012 - 03:32 PM
How about a non-recursive one?
FilterValues (
listOfFiles ;
Substitute ( listOfFiles & ¶ ; [ ".txt" & ¶ ; "§" ] ; [ ".TXT" & ¶ ; "∆" ] ; [ ¶ ; "±¶" ] ; [ "§" ; ".txt" & ¶ ] ; [ "∆" ; ".TXT" & ¶ ] )
)
FilterValues (
listOfFiles ;
Substitute ( listOfFiles & ¶ ; [ ".txt" & ¶ ; "§" ] ; [ ".TXT" & ¶ ; "∆" ] ; [ ¶ ; "±¶" ] ; [ "§" ; ".txt" & ¶ ] ; [ "∆" ; ".TXT" & ¶ ] )
)
#6
Lifelong FM Student
Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:37 PM
Now this rivals your Tower of Hanoi calculation and your laminated calculation as well. Absolute genius, watching the switch work through it.
Is there any reason (other than clarity) that you listed it as ".TXT" & ¶ instead of "TXT¶" ?
Is there any reason (other than clarity) that you listed it as ".TXT" & ¶ instead of "TXT¶" ?
Each assumption is an educated guess, a likely condition or event, presumed known and true in the absence of absolute certainty.
#7
consultant
Posted 25 February 2012 - 06:55 PM
Is there any reason (other than clarity) that you listed it as ".TXT" & ¶ instead of "TXT¶" ?
Well, the idea is to generalize it into suffix & ¶
BTW, at least part of the credit goes to Agnes Barouh.
Now this rivals your Tower of Hanoi calculation
I have a Tower of Hanoi calculation?
#8
master
Posted 26 February 2012 - 02:48 AM
What are these icons?
"§" "∆" & why are you using them in the calculation? thanks
-i
"§" "∆" & why are you using them in the calculation? thanks
-i
#9
consultant
Posted 26 February 2012 - 02:57 AM
They are characters assumed not to be used in listOfFiles.
#10
master
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:37 AM
thanksThey are characters assumed not to be used in listOfFiles.
#11
ChindoguMaker
Posted 26 February 2012 - 01:07 PM
How about a non-recursive one?
Ahh, the power of FilterValues ( ) !
Well done.
Daniele
--------------------------------
I'm sorry for my English
--------------------------------
I'm sorry for my English
#12
Lifelong FM Student
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:00 PM
I have a Tower of Hanoi calculation?
Well that is what I named your calculation where you first used §§ within Substitute() to play switch-a-roo with the values in this way. Your formula reminded me of Tower of Hanoi http://www.cut-the-k...nce/hanoi.shtml which I had first learned of from a great post here
http://attic.fmforum...earch/1/#187899.
Unfortunately, I could not find that original post where you first presented it and I sure tried. I believe it was around 2007. If you didn't have a billion posts on all the forums it would be easier but please continue making it difficult for us to keep up with your work. You would think I would remember the exact calculation of yours but it was not the formula that mattered in that instance but rather the power of using Substitute() to re-work values in such a pretty, recursive fashion. Tower of Hanoi is pretty cool.
I miss Søren. He always added so much flavor (and sometimes heat, LOL) to a discussion.
Each assumption is an educated guess, a likely condition or event, presumed known and true in the absence of absolute certainty.
#13
Mostly Harmless
Posted 26 February 2012 - 03:41 PM
I miss Søren. He always added so much flavor (and sometimes heat, LOL) to a discussion.
Yes. It was from reading his posts that I developed an enthusiasm for cyrptology. He certainly had a way with words.
Vaughan Bromfield
Sydney, Australia
Please post questions to the Forum, not directly to me. Back-up your files before making changes!
Whenever I hear the term "popular culture" I reach for my Iridium Q-36 Space Modulator.
Sydney, Australia
Please post questions to the Forum, not directly to me. Back-up your files before making changes!
Whenever I hear the term "popular culture" I reach for my Iridium Q-36 Space Modulator.
#14
consultant
Posted 26 February 2012 - 04:32 PM
Your formula reminded me of Tower of Hanoi
I see - but the Tower of Hanoi is something much more complex. This is just 'cover the furniture while I spray-paint'.
#15
enthusiast
Posted 26 February 2012 - 05:20 PM
LaRetta, I believe your original "Tower of Hanoi" post is here:
http://filemakertoda...for-final-comma
"Thanks, Michael. What a pretty switch-a-roo! I'm naming your calc Tower of Hanoi."
http://filemakertoda...for-final-comma
"Thanks, Michael. What a pretty switch-a-roo! I'm naming your calc Tower of Hanoi."
#16
Lifelong FM Student
Posted 26 February 2012 - 06:10 PM
Then I'm mistaken because that wasn't the calc I was thinking of. But thank you for finding it anyway!!
Well, I think many calculations are gorgeous and it's hard to find a favorite!
Well, I think many calculations are gorgeous and it's hard to find a favorite!
Each assumption is an educated guess, a likely condition or event, presumed known and true in the absence of absolute certainty.

































