3 posts in this topic
greetings all! A question for the network security gurus: I have Supercontainer running in standalone mode. My router has port forwarding to the machine (Mac-mini). My credit card vendor requires security IP address scans and I am failing due to the port forwarding on the router. what is best practice? I am using a router flashed with Tomato Shibby.
We operate a FileMaker-based event registration system that communicates with a SQL back end. Our customer will be using it for two demo tours they are running, 1 in France and 1 in Germany. Both tours run from April 2016 – June 2016. They have their events on Friday, Saturday and Sunday and we are looking for help providing on-call phone support during their European hours of operation. I don’t have their exact event schedule yet, but each tour will have 8-10 stops – occupying most weekends April - June.
The tour staff speaks English. Preregistration records are downloaded from the SQL back end before the team departs from their hotel for the day. On site, they connect the (PC) laptop which hosts the FM12 database to a wireless router. They connect up to 6 iPads to the wireless router and open the FM database using FM Go.
If they’re going to have trouble, it’s usually at the start of the day – not a great time for a US-based company to support a European client. And it’s usually at the start of the tour, while they work on getting the routine down.
If this is something that you or the company you work for could help us with, please send me an email combining my username here with the domain printcomm.com.
By Craig Wall
I have designed a solution that is shared over a network that I remotely oversee. My client has witnessed frequent loss of client connection, and I see it myself about once a day when I log in remotely.
Losing connection is an issue in itself which I've been researching.
But what I'd like your opinion about is a related issue. Several staff members swear that on a few occasions when they lose their connection that they also lost some of their work. I've viewed this a spurious claim because of the nature of FM. Sure, I, conceded, you might lose the work in one field but I haven't seen it as possible to lose more than that.
Am I wrong? Is it possible in a network environment to lose data--beyond the active field?
I'm wondering what the best way to store images in a container field is if I would like to do the following.
- Have the images be stored outside of the database
- be able to access the images with and iPad or iPhone
I'm setting up a wordpress to ecommerce store that will grab images from the filemaker records and post them to the WP server. My thought was that having the images outside the database i.e setup through the 'manage container' dialog, would be easier for resolving to the file path for the image.
This method gives me good response on one machine, and If I add the images to a network drive I can access the database and images over a network. Also no problem.
However, if I want to access the database on an iPad or iPhone, the only way I can get the images is by adding them as a 'reference only'.
How can I can get the best of both worlds? I Don't want to store references of images, but I also would like to have access to them through an iPad.