Jump to content

Leaderboard


Popular Content

Showing most liked content since 07/22/2016 in all areas

  1. 4 points
    Hi All, I am happy to present the FmDynamix project, including cfCall () and #load (), my new 2 custom functions .... In an interest to further test FileMaker more and more ... I tried to give you a presentation of this new method, as explicit as possible, I hope to have succeeded ! You have the description and the presentation here, and take before the file demo : fmx_FmDynamix_Presentation.fmp12 I hope that this file will give you the urge to see this method, I do not think I have view of similar thing I hope that this "modularity" will please you and will give some ideas, feel free to test and give me your comments ! Thanks for your interest Agnès ( and thank you to Google Translate too )
  2. 4 points
    Security Vulnerabilities of FileMaker Platform API’s: An Update January 9th 2017 In an April 2016 entry on this BLOG titled The FileMaker Platform API’s Are Your Friends, Right? [http://fmforums.com/blogs/entry/1535-the-filemaker-platform-api’s-are-your-friends-right/] I discussed a number of FileMaker Platform security issues centered on the uncontrolled use of a number of external Application Program Interfaces (API’s). There are at least nine of these API, possibly more, if ExecuteSQL is included. The central thesis of that article was that these API’s provide unexpected attack vectors to compromise FileMaker Platform files. As noted at the time: Many FileMaker developers are not aware, however, that these API’s have the capability to access customer or client solutions in unexpected ways and to extract or insert data, to manipulate business processes developers embedded into these solutions, and to compromise the integrity of these solutions. Unfortunately, in the intervening nine-month time span, we continue to see cases where several of these API have been used for malicious purposes to compromise FileMaker Platform files’ business process integrity, to manipulate data, and to extract data. And many in the developer community remain unaware of this problem. In this BLOG entry, I will describe two of these API’s in greater specificity and detail, including describing a variety of attacks they can facilitate. This article will not discuss the ActiveX API that is available on Windows OS; however, developers should give similar attention to that approach. Developers need to be aware of these items in order to protect their files and those of their clients. The two API at the center of this focus are Apple Events and the FMPURL process. In the earlier article, I noted several elements about these that bear repeating here: [These API] cause particular concern because of their breadth and relative ease of use…. The Apple Events Suite has an extensive set of commands that can read and write data, read metadata, manipulate the UI, and trigger scripts. In addition, they can work outside the normal constraints found on layouts in a file. [http://thefmkb.com/5671] The FMPURL…can open a file and run a script in it. If the file is already open, then the script will still run. [http://thefmkb.com/5560] A few general comments about both of these API’s: · They are not platform-specific in the sense that just because a client organization is an all Windows OS environment that it is immune from an Apple Event attack. It’s the OS of the attacker that controls whether the API can be used. · There are some ways within Privilege Sets to constrain behavior of these API commands when they are applied on a file. The Export privilege bit can control the ability of Apple Events to extract data from a file. The Layout Access privilege bits can also constrain the ability to see contents of a layout. Likewise, Script Access privilege bits can control the availability of a script to either of these API. · These API often perform actions in unexpected fashions that fall outside the normal, traditional, and familiar FileMaker Pro User Interface behavior. This is part of what catches developers by surprise. —Apple Events— When a file is open, whether standalone or hosted by FileMaker Server, an attacker can send Apple Event commands to it causing it to perform a variety of actions, including: · Run any script to which the user has access, irrespective of whether that script is in the list of Scripts or whether it is attached to some UI element, such as a button. · Navigate to any Layout irrespective of whether that Layout’s name is in the list of Layouts or not. If the user’s Privilege Set has access to see that Layout, then its contents are visible whether the developer ever intended for the user to view the Layout or not. · Return various metadata about the file, including such items as Script Names, Value List Items, Layout Names, Field Names, etc. If a user’s Privilege Set does not allow access to the item, its name does not appear in the list returned. · Put data into any field in the database or extract data from any field, irrespective of whether that field is on the active Layout or is on any Layout for that matter. Here are several examples of these scripts, all working on a file named Our_Secret_Information.fmp12. tell application "FileMaker Pro Advanced" activate go to first layout end tell tell application "FileMaker Pro Advanced" activate do script FileMaker script "Relog_as_Admin" end tell tell application "FileMaker Pro Advanced" activate set somevar to name of every layout end tell tell application "FileMaker Pro Advanced" activate set somevar to name of every field end tell tell application "FileMaker Pro Advanced" activate set somevar to get data field "CreditCardNumber" end tell —FMPURL— The FMPURL command’s principal attack vector is that it can be used to run any Script in a file to which a user’s privileges has access. Similar to Apple Events, this occurs irrespective of whether that script is in the list of Scripts or whether it is attached to some UI element, such as a button. If the file is closed, the command first opens the file with supplied credentials, then runs any OnFirstWindowOpen script, and then runs the designated script from the FMPURL command. As a result of this behavior, a Halt Script step at the end of the opening script has the effect of blocking the running of the FMPURL designated script. Some developers have utilized this technique to block FMPURL calls to scripts in a file. However, if the file is already opened or if there is no opening script, then the designated script does run. Here is an example of calling a script, again in our file Our_Secret_Information.fmp12 being hosted at a server at IP address 0.0.0.0. fmp://0.0.0.0/Our_Secret_Information.fmp12?script= Relog_as_Admin —What Is the Significance Of This and How Do We Address This?— One of the many reasons we caution developers against embedding security elements such as Identity and Access Management controls into the data layer of FileMaker Pro databases is precisely because such elements are vulnerable to these API attacks. Think for a minute about that Relog_as_Admin script that presumably relogs into the file with a [Full Access] Account. If an Attacker can trigger that script and cause it to run, irrespective of what the developer might have intended, then the Attacker has full access to the file. This has actually happened. Or, suppose that a developer has made a “Developer_Only” layout in the file, removed it from the list of layouts, and left sensitive information on it. If the Attacker can navigate to that layout, and if it is not protected by settings in the Privilege Set, then the Attacker can learn the contents of the information on it. This has actually happened in numerous instances, including unbelievably, the appearance of [Full Access] level credentials left exposed on the layout! Likewise, suppose that a developer has made a so-called “Privileges Table” with various fields that purport to control whether a user can do such things as create records. Using the Apple Event Set Data command, an Attacker could likely change the values in these fields if they do not enjoy additional protection. More likely even, the Attacker could simply issue a Make New Record command and create the record. That is a process frequently used to thwart developer-imposed limitations on the number of records in a demonstration version of a vertical market solution. So, what can be done to manage this situation and to prevent these type attacks? In FileMaker® Pro 15, FileMaker, Inc. added a new Extended Privilege option in the Privilege Set called fmscriptdisabled. Developers must explicitly invoke this option; it is not a default option. What it does is to prevent Apple Events (Macintosh OS) and ActiveX commands (Windows OS) from activating scripts, just as the name implies. It has no impact on FMPURL or on other Apple Event commands that do not involve triggering of scripts. Some of the other items in a Privilege Set, notably Export and data layer modification elements, can control Get Data and Set Data Apple Events. If Export is disabled, then Get Data will not return data from the selected field. In tables where the editing privileges are restricted, likewise, Set Data will not add data to a field. Creation and deletion privileges behave in similar fashion. Remember, we are talking here only about Apple Events. Other processes may behave differently. Controlling API behavior is important; however, it is not the only security feature that developers must invoke to assure Confidentiality, Availability, and Integrity of their database systems. So, clearly what we need here is a way to block these API from interacting with FileMaker Pro files. FileMaker, Inc. is aware of these issues and has been working on new ways to address them. In the Product Road Map Webinar presented on November 30th 2016, FileMaker, Inc. noted that the next version of the FileMaker Platform will contain a number of additional security enhancements. I am authorized to say that one of those enhancements will be a new process for more closely and granularly controlling several of these API’s. At such time as there is any new version of the FileMaker Platform, I will have additional comments and analyses of the issues related to these API’s.
  3. 3 points

    Version 1.0.0

    43 downloads

    This technique was inspired by @Claus Lavendt in a tweet. Now with offset new card style mode you can now create a tool pallet to interact with a document in preview mode

    Free

  4. 3 points
    Couldn't this be much simpler? AppleScriptSpeak.fmp12
  5. 2 points
    Let's all get along? It's been rare for our forums, but on occasions I have had to step in to keep the peace and harmony of the site. At times personalities clash - and the typed repsonses are often done in haste - and the sort of thing that wouldn't be said if we were all in same room together. I am encouraging everyone to re-read https://fmforums.com/guidelines/ our guidelines. Let's please keep threads on topic. - and not abuse the "reporting" system. Please be courteous of others and if you have offended someone please extend a sincere apology. The least thing I enjoy doing is to put people in 'timeout' or ban them from the site. Thank you.
  6. 2 points
    I don't think playing 20 questions is a good method to get to the bottom of this. No one can tell why something fails without being able to reproduce the problem on their own first. The proper way to present this would be to attach the two files - preferably reduced to the absolute minimum that still shows the problem. Without this, all we can do is generalize and/or guess. In general, I can think of two possible reasons why records will not be imported: 1. There are no records to import; 2. There are records to import, but they do not pass validation. Now for the guess part: First, I don't know what you mean by "the autocomplete box on import". I am going to guess it's actually the "Perform auto-enter options while importing" option. And I am going to guess further that one or more of your fields is defined to auto-enter a value and validated as Not empty, Validate always. And I am going to guess that the source file contains no data to import into this field.
  7. 2 points
    Aleesha, another thing which fits for you right now is making it easy on yourself in future to know specifically which table occurrences have Allow Creation turned on. It looks obvious here but as your solution grows, it won't always be obvious and we can forget as well. What many developers do is use the text tool to create reminders such as the A or a - if 'deletion' or S for sort.
  8. 2 points
    Apparently, the issue is fixed in FileMaker 16.0.2!
  9. 2 points
    I'm not sure which topic this belongs in but... I really just wanted to let everyone on these forums know how thankful I am for your support, advice and guidance. Over the past few years as my small business has grown into a bigger business I've needed filemaker to do more advanced things and as I am not a developer and simply a business owner, I've turned to these forums and to you all and I couldn't have built my database without your help. From the bottom of my heart thank you so much!! Matt
  10. 2 points
    Hello Everyone, I've written a PowerShell script to allow you to get a free SSL certificate from Let's Encrypt to use with FileMaker Server. You can schedule this to run every few months and renew your certificate automatically. Now there's no reason to keep using that default certificate. Check out the post for instructions! How to Use Let’s Encrypt SSL Certificates with FileMaker Server | Blue Feather - FileMaker Developer, Android, Web EDIT: One compatibility note for everyone - While it looks like it's all compatible with FileMaker Pro 13-15, only FileMaker Go 15 is compatible. FileMaker Go 14 is unable to connect with these certificates installed. I'd recommend using FM Go 15 anyway, but it's something to be aware of if you're still using FM Go 14.
  11. 2 points
    Extra step: yes. Hassle: after a while it doesn't feel that way because that new Layout Object inspector brings so much goodness that you'll use it all the time anyway and it won' feel like a hassle to have to move over to it. It'll become a very natural flow of your layout design. But it definitely is a change and requires a bit of mental retraining and so there is a bit of 'who moved my cheese'. I certainly scoffed at it in the beginning, now I can think of all the bigger hassles I had to go through before having this.
  12. 2 points
    Not sure if "master list" = client cache. I've not heard that term. However, I've read that some are seeing bad data (outdated) because of cache! Several desperate posts on TechNet. https://community.filemaker.com/thread/168254 But good reviews here: https://blog.beezwax.net/2016/06/15/performance-optimizations-make-compelling-case-for-filemaker-15-upgrade/
  13. 2 points
    I doubt very much you need or want to do that. What would be the purpose of this? You will end up with several numbered Category fields. Numbered fields are a prime example of poor database structure. You won't be able to find a record by its category, unless you search all the fields. You won't be able to define a relationship matching on category. You won't be able to produce a report of records grouped by category. I suggest you either split the field into individual records in a related table or just substitute the > character with a carriage return, so that your field contains a list of the relevant categories (same as a checkbox field would).
  14. 2 points
    Not sure I follow entirely, but in your script, just before the "Show Custom Dialog" just do a Set Field [Examples::MASTER CODE ; "" ]
  15. 2 points
    http://www.soliantconsulting.com/blog
  16. 2 points
    See: http://www.filemaker.com/help/16/fmp/en/#page/FMP_Help%2Fextended-privileges.html%23wwconnect_header (the last item in the table).
  17. 2 points
    That doesn't actually help the user find the answer to his question, it answers a different one, and there are reasons for wanting this one answered.
  18. 2 points
    Clearly the file was damaged and in order to make it open FM had to delete large chunks of the corrupted file. In this case that were data blocks. Nothing much that can be done with it. You can try to recover with different versions of FM. You can try to recover on Mac and on Windows. Those are all long shots but you never know. What it really points to is that the file was used in a manner that led to this corruption. Very often that is because of OS-level file sharing, AV scanning,... If you have other FM files in use, carefully scrutenize your deployment to make sure you minimize the risk that other files will get damaged.
  19. 2 points
    You could write simply: If ( CountryAbbreviated1__lxt = "CA" and ( StateAbbreviated1__lxt = "NU" or StateAbbreviated1__lxt = "NT" or StateAbbreviated1__lxt = "YT" ) ; "Territory" ) Or, if you prefer a shorter version: If ( CountryAbbreviated1__lxt = "CA" and not IsEmpty ( FilterValues ( StateAbbreviated1__lxt ; "NU¶NT¶YT" ) ) ; "Territory" ) I see no good reason to use the Let() function only to rename your fields. I also don't see a good reason to use such gobbledygook field names to begin with. And the numeric suffixes raise a red flag: if you're using numbered fields, you almost certainly have a structural issue.
  20. 2 points
    if you change layouts while in find mode, the OnLayoutEnter will fire. But it has to be enabled for Find mode of course. If you want to trap the user switching modes on the same layout then the OnModeExit will do. OnRecordLoad fires after the Layout change but if you only want to capture the layout or mode change then RecordLoad is overkill since it fires on all record changes. Soliant has a big blog post with a triggers playground demo file that has all possible triggers enabled to make it easy to see the exact firings and sequences.
  21. 2 points
    One way to do it is with conditional formatting. Based on the results of a calculation, you can change the color of the text to match the layout background; or, you can change the size of the text to a very large number so that it's pushed outside the boundaries of the field or text box.
  22. 2 points
    One could turn your argument around: suppose you are editing the script, and you want to make a change to the Set Field[] step; you would have to leave the script workspace and look for the calculation field in order to make the change there. I believe that if an action is scripted, it's good practice to place all the necessary logic within the script. And if you divide your scripts into logical parts and take care to comment each part, you should not have to look very hard in order to find what you're looking for.
  23. 2 points
    FWIW, nothing in this list would take 5 minutes are less... so be a bit careful expressing things like this, you might not get the takers that you want.
  24. 2 points
    You can also use Export Field Contents and skip specifying the field. There are a few more ways as well, such as exporting 0 records using same path file name. All similar principle so it's which you like best. I like Export Field Contents; picked up from Comment, I suspect.
  25. 2 points
    Yet another option: sort the found records by the DeliveryRemaining field, ascending (or descending) and check the value of the last (or first) record.
  26. 2 points
    Good points, well-taken; but I can't shake the feeling that you're thinking like salesmen rather than like customers. Many people are "penny wise and pound foolish", whether we like it or not, and I used to make my living getting hired to cater to that and then guiding them to better decisions — but only if their decision to use FileMaker allowed me to get my foot in the door. It's nice if you can say, "Well, I really don't know if I want those people as clients" but I made a decent living off them, once, and now I'm not anymore. I agree FileMaker Cloud is a step in the right direction (taking your calculations at face value - I have a cold right now and can't really think through the figures myself at the moment.) Thinking back to when my clients were mostly small mom & pop businesses and nonprofits (and I was much busier as a consultant than I am today) I'm sure about half of them would have seen your reasoning. But for half of them, the appeal was that they could host FM on the old mac mini they had sitting in the corner and never have to think about it. The conceptual hurdle of dealing with AWS & EC2, for the non-computer-literate clients that it used to seem to me were FileMaker's bread and butter, is much more immense than it is to you and me. For the same reason that clients still insist on onsite visits even after TeamViewer and Skype have made physical presence 99.9% unnecessary, mom & pop operations also aren't going to cotton to offsite virtual servers with complicated administrative interfaces that they have to learn (when they can just barely figure out how to use word.) It makes them feel like they're now dependent on more things outside their control, and they don't like that. I can't imagine selling a virtual-server-based 5-seat-minimum system with monthly licensing to a lot of the people who I used to survive off of. They just wouldn't bite. Even if it was free they'd still think it was too complicated for them, it's too weird and abstract, and they'd be too worried about perpetual dependence on me keeping the server running. Whether it was true or not. The whole point was the FileMaker used to be for people who didn't want to have to become technically-adept computer geeks. AWS is precisely for technically-adept computer geeks, and it's a very beautiful thing for them, but that's who its for. The thing that sucks, to me, is, FileMaker doesn't necessarily have to be one or the other. There can be both a monthly cloud-based licensing model for teams AND a FileMaker-Go-for-desktop-type "thin client". Also, I know I've seen people cringe when I mention the software subscription model. I know it's worth it, and you know it's worth it, but Mr. McGintee whose little heath food store could improve its narrow margins running much more efficiently on on FMP only hears "I want you to keep paying forever and ever for something you used to only have to pay for once". Yes, I know the flaws in that reasoning. But that's what people hear. And I, for one, would really just rather be developing databases than trying to sell Mr. McGintee on whatever licensing model FMI has decided to adopt this year. Sucks dealing with human quirks, but until I can reliably score consulting gigs on planet Vulcan, these are the things we have to think about. If FM could find a way to increase their penetration in the enterprise realm, and I could get steady enough corporate gigs not to miss the small businesses who used to call me all the time, I'd have no complaint. And the funny thing is, I still get a fair number of calls for help from solitary users using one-person databases. It's that small business, the 3-5 person companies that used to be a rich vein for me, are where the demand seems to have completely been hollowed out. I hope to be pleasantly surprised, but I just don't see FileMaker Cloud bringing those kind of people back to the platform. And there used to be a lot of them. I've posted this elsewhere, but look at this Google Trends graph for search interest in FileMaker: Despite vast improvements in the program, interest (as expressed in google searches for information ) has dropped by 50% every 4 years. It's now declined to about 1/10th of its peak. That should scare the bejeezus out of anyone who makes their living this way, and I just don't think that decline was because of lack of a technically abstruse (to non-IT-professionals) monthly cloud-based licensing option. I firmly believe, based solely on my own experience then and now, that 10 years ago there was a huge, solid base of very small, funky business users that just aren't there anymore, and I would really like FMI to try to find a way to get them back. Not a way that sounds good to you or to me, but to THEM, something simple and uncomplicated yet still powerful under the hood (just like FileMaker used to be.) AWS support isn't that, regardless of price. And, again, it doesn't have to come at the expense of other options. They could offer thin clients on the bottom and all kinds of fancy licensing at the top, broaden their appeal on both ends. Oops, looks like I've ranted again. Apologies, I didn't mean to harangue you. But that graph above is what it all comes down to for me, and I find it very frustrating, because FMI's product marketing strategy seems to be alienating a formerly lucrative segment of their former user base, as if they must be sacrificed to attract a new segment - one which isn't proving itself at the same rate. It baffles me. I just think "FileMaker Go For Desktop" is a good step towards getting those lost customers back in the fold.
  27. 2 points
    There are some nuances worth mentioning here. For example, the default Filemaker find looks for words that begin with the search phrase. Highlighting the search phrase as pattern is more inclusive. Say you searched for "little" and the found record contains "Doctor Doolittle belittled his little friend". Highlighting the pattern "little" will result in "Doctor Doolittle belittled his little friend" - but the first two highlighted occurrences played no part in the search.
  28. 2 points
    This cannot be done by using find alone. Filemaker will find records that contain something. It will not do calculations or comparisons during the find. Now, there are two ways to accomplish what you want: a slow one, and a fast one: The slow method requires that you find the records that will participate in this (if you want to see the latest revision of all products, then do Show All Records at this stage) and sort them by the field in question, ascending. Then go to the first record and loop: If the product-code part in the current record matches the product-code part of the next record, omit the current record. Otherwise go to next record. Note: if you only want to see the latest revision of a single product, then it can be simpler (and much faster). Find the records of the wanted product, sort them, go to first record and omit multiple records using Get ( FoundCount ) - 1 as the number of records to omit. The fast method would require a structural change. At minimum, you need to split the field in question into two separate fields (that's always good practice, embodied by the maxim "one fact per field") . This would enable you to use the Fast Summaries method and omit an entire group of records (except the last record in the group) at once. You would also have to add a summary field that counts the records. Even better solution would have a table of Products, where each product-code would be unique, and a related table of Revisions. Then you could get the latest revision of each product by using a calculation getting the Max() or Last() revision number. Or show it directly from the Revisions table using a sorted portal/relationship.
  29. 2 points
    I'll echo the recommendation for the scripted approach - but with a caution about not overdoing the script triggers. Where possible roll the field updates into the normal scripted flow. Script triggers have a tendency to fire even when you really wish they wouldn't and the extra maintenance can be a hassle.
  30. 2 points
    Okay, then. The first thing that needs to be clear here is this: if you want your report to show every day of the selected month, even if you have no records for that day, you will need a reporting table with 31 permanent records numbered serially and global fields for the month and year to report on. The relationship between this table (Days) and your existing table (Records) will be: Days:cDate ≥ Records::DateAdmitted AND Days::cDate ≤ RecordsDateDismissed where cDate is of course a calculation field = Date ( gMonth ; SerialNumber ; gYear ) Then you can count the related checkbox field in order to get the number of events that should be shown in each day's record. Your reporting script needs to look at gMonth and gYear and omit the appropriate number of records from the report (e.g. the last 3 records if it's February in a non-leap year).
  31. 2 points
    Hi John, One thing you can do is go to Manage > Themes and duplicate the Classic theme. YOu'll need to also then change all layouts to point to this new theme. You can then modify the new custom theme all you wish. Keep in mind that you may lose some of your fields' formats if you've set them 'outside' of the defined style and have probably even used 'format painter' on many fields (which can greatly impact your layout loads). You will find that a newer theme will lighten your solution's footprint but there might be some cleanup to do. Once done, you should be good to go. Hi Barbara!!
  32. 2 points
    In a true transaction model you never delete a transaction, you compensate by making another if an adjustment is needed... Think accounting.
  33. 2 points
    I would start by defining the Recruiting Event field to validate as Unique. Then make your script: Freeze Window Set Variable [$Source; Value: Person::Source] Go to Layout ["RecruitingList" (Recruiting)] Set Error Capture [ On ] New Record/Request Set Field [Recruiting::Recruiting Event; $Source] Commit Records/Requests If [ Get ( LastError ) = 504 ] Revert Record/Request [ No dialog ] End If Go to Layout [original layout]
  34. 2 points
    Try: Set Variable [ $txt; Value:AnyTable::gTextfield ] # # OUTER LOOP Go to Layout [ “Questions” (Questions) ] Set Variable [ $i; Value:1 ] Loop Exit Loop If [ $i > ValueCount ( $txt ) ] New Record/Request Set Field [ Questions::Question; GetValue ( $txt ; $i ) ] Set Variable [ $qID; Value:Questions::QuestionID ] # # INNER LOOP Go to Layout [ “Options” (Options) ] Loop Set Variable [ $j; Value:$j + 1 ] Exit Loop If [ $j > 5 ] # Set Variable [ $option; Value:GetValue ( $txt ; $i + $j ) ] Set Variable [ $correct; Value:Left ( $option ; 4 ) = "[X] " ] # New Record/Request Set Field [ Options::QuestionID; $qID ] Set Field [ Options::Option; If ( $correct ; Right ( $option ; Length ( $option ) - 4 ) ; $option ) ] Set Field [ Options::IsCorrect; $correct ] End Loop # Go to Layout [ “Questions” (Questions) ] Set Variable [ $i; Value:$i + 7 ] Set Variable [ $j; Value:"" ] End Loop Note that this assumes more than one option can be correct. Otherwise it would be better to store the correct option's ID in the parent question's record.
  35. 2 points
    I am not aware of any system that can summarize millions of records on demand. The general idea is to denormalize some aspects of the solution. For example, you could pre-summarize the transactions from previous years, and supplement this by a "live" summary of this year's records. Hopefully, the reason why "sadly the stored values occasionally become inaccurate" is not modification of history records - otherwise you will need more help than any human can provide.
  36. 2 points
    For years, I have used Case() exclusively, because it does everything that If() does and more. In fact, I viewed If() as a legacy function, provided only for backward compatibility. Recently, however, under the influence of other programming languages, I have decided that the better practice is to use Case() only when there are multiple tests. This makes it easier for anyone reading the formula. I've never understood the "I may need to add more tests later" thing; how long does it take to double-click "If" and type "Case" over it? I am not aware of any differences in performance.
  37. 2 points
    The Brooms they "swap away crazy styling of the text". LOL So if you have copied and pasted some test in from an email or another source...and it has some weird styling... cleaning it can be a pain in the butt. I know this personally. I eat my own dog food. So I put in the broom!!! Yay baby!!! - Richard Carlton
  38. 2 points
    See if the attached demo helps: GenerateItems.fp7
  39. 2 points
    For the most part people come to FM Forums seeking advice or assistance. If given a little thought, your topic can really engage the reader to want to assist you in finding the best answer or solution. Step 1: Choose Wisely! By first looking at the topical nature of the forums you can see there are many different forums that cover a wide range of discussions. By way of self-curating the site, try to choose a forum that covers the intent of your topic. We realize that some items cross boundaries and that is ok, just choose a forum that fits the spirit of your topic. If it's wrong a moderator will move it to a forum that best suits the conversation. Step 2: Titles, Names, & Tags Be terse but informative. With your topic title, encourage your reader to want to read your topic. Don't be needy or demanding with "please help" post titles. We realize you've hit a brick wall or may be very frustrated or have a demanding boss. But take a breath - it will be ok. Then compose a topic title that draws them in. Add a tag or two, they will appear next to the topic, it can just be a simple word or phrase that tags the post to some FileMaker-centric topic. Step 3: No Need for Apologies It is not necessary to start your post with an apology to the reader regarding where you are posting or your current understanding of a topic. We are pretty nice here and won't fault you for trying. Step 4: Prerequisite In order for your reader to provide the best response, make sure your profile has been updated with the platform and version of FileMaker that you are using. Otherwise we will assume you are using the most current versions, and the advice given may not work in older versions. If your post is specific to a version / platform / deployment please inform the reader — we don't necessarily need your computer specs, just enough background so that the reader can envision your environment. Step 5: Goals Stating your desired goals, and what you are attempting to achieve in a simple statement will aid the reader as they read further in to the details of your conversation. Step 6: What have you tried? Outline your process and steps you have taken, to get to you the point you are at. It doesn't have to be overly verbose, an essay isn't necessary. Step 7: Format for Emphasis Use the WYSIWYG editor to format text as needed to provide details. You can reference generic terms such as table::field or use your own nomenclature but if the context dictates provide the reader clarity what things may mean if they would not be apparent to someone outside your organization, or industry. this is code from a calculation bullets lists Step 8: Pictures & Sample Files Admit it, you know you miss Show & Tell from kindergarten. Re-live a past life by providing a screen image of your solution. Provide the reader information and context. Use third party tools to draw arrows on your image if needed. Can you send a clone of your solution? - If you do please make sure confidential data is removed, and your boss says it is ok. If you are modifying a commercial version of software that you have purchased — we request that you not do post a clone of these files; as that would be most likely against your terms of service. In that case you can make and post a sample file that recreates the issue you are having. Step 9: Cross Posting There are other venues on the internet that discuss FileMaker and many of our users are active participants of these resources. If you have already posted your question or topic on another site please copy the link and mention that your topic is a cross post this way others will know and may choose to review the threads and offer alternatives or not repeat a reply in both places. If you received your answer please report back here with a link to the response so that we all have a sense of closure. Step 10: A Sense of Humor Keep your sense of humor, and don't forget to smile. The site is visited by members of all skill levels, many are full time developers and consultants and generously volunteer their time and energy to the site. When the occasion calls for it give them your gratitude . A little levity never hurts. Also keep in mind that American English is not everyone's native language -- some things may not translate. If English is not your first language, just do your best. We really appreciate this! It gives us a little spring in our step.
  40. 2 points
    Here's one way. RowCalc.fp7.zip
  41. 1 point
    Hi LaRetta, I am excited as well, hijack anytime. I just finished that video. We are still on 14 also but I think we will move to 16 later this year because this sure seems like a great improvement. Thank you everyone. I always get very excited when I come here because I get such great ideas and help.
  42. 1 point
  43. 1 point
    A couple of ways: - an easy - but unintuitive - FM way is to export an empty field to the same file name; FM will delete the target file - or use Send Event and use the OS CLI to delete the file - (if you are already using a plugin with file manipulation functions, then it can be done that way too)
  44. 1 point
    This is going to be awkward any way you look at it, because Filemaker has no mechanism for sorting fields. Obviously, these values should be in individual records of a related table - and I am not saying this as an aside. Even a repeating field would be better than 6 individual fields. If I had to do this with your current structure, I would compare each field with all its 5 siblings, e.g. Self > Field 2, Self > Field 3, etc. Then, if 3 or more of these comparisons returned true, the field is in the top 3 (leaving aside the problem of ties).
  45. 1 point
    I'm using Let(_path = Substitute(Get(DocumentsPath);"/";"\\") & "Manifest_Detail_Imports\\"; Right(_path;Length(_path)-1) ) then BE_ListFilesInFolder ( $_import_directory;"csv" ) to list the contents of the directory to read the contents of \Documents\Manifest_Detail_Imports on my server doing it server-side is massively faster and less troublesome than using a client to run imports.
  46. 1 point
    For me, the lack of server-side-schedules is a deal-breaker. But, as you say, it's a version 1 product. Hoping they add this in the future.
  47. 1 point
    Hi LaRetta, Sorry I meant to write back yesterday and let you know that I can confirm what you are seeing. Wow, and I thought it was me when it happened in my files. Lee
  48. 1 point
    You would not want it to be a Calculation field - because that would show empty or wrong values if you changed your found set or sorted your records. In theory, it would be possible to make it a Text field with auto-entered calculated value. In practice, that would require a complicated custom function. Which would run exactly once per record. And you would have to remember to remove it in future versions of your solution, after you have imported all your records. As webko suggested, make it a a part of your importing script.
  49. 1 point
    Hello all Here we've posted an example FileMaker 13/12 calendar. You can download it for free and use it in your own code. Go here to read blog post. Have fun! The igeeks
  50. 1 point
    This might help: http://sixfriedrice.com/wp/filemaker-9-tip9-web-viewers-without-the-web/
This leaderboard is set to Los Angeles/GMT-07:00
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.