
keywords
Members-
Content Count
12 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Community Reputation
0 NeutralAbout keywords
-
Rank
member
Profile Information
-
Gender
Not Telling
-
Total of foundset removing values under $500 on list view
keywords replied to PatrickDes's topic in Remote Container Fields
If you total is provided by a summary field then it should simply be a case of constraining your found set. A summary field totals the current found set. -
It's not clear what you mean by "edit mode". Do you mean Browse mode—in which users can enter and edit data in fields? Or do you mean Layout mode—in which you, as developer, can edit the layout itself? If you mean Browse mode: it could be that the layout is stuck in Preview mode; or that a script is running; or maybe other possibilities.
-
Minimum charge script not working as needed
keywords replied to colornet's topic in Script Workspace and Script Triggers
The second Set Field step in your script (after the Else If) will not work as the field to be set is not specified, only the result to be posted. On the other hand, see comments above if the target field you intend to be set is in fact a calc field. -
Re: "I can solve this by creating an opener file with everyone's user name and password, but I'd rather not have to do this with every new end user!" Every new end user will have to have credentials set up—or at least assigned, if you use shared credentials such as Staff, or Accounts Staff—for the target file anyway, so I'm not sure I see the problem. The opener file should have the same set of accounts as the target file, and should be where users actually log in—your log in script will then carry over the credentials they enter, log them into the target file, and lastly close the opener
-
Re: "for some reason the "Allow editing of of value list" option was (and still is) dimmed out on the data inspector." This is always dimmed out if the value list is based on contents of a field.
-
Fair enough!
-
I've only just seen this post from a week or so back, but here is a thought. "Comment" said: "with no date being given, it will use the first date on its calendar". I am not so sure about that; it could use the current date as the default date—it would be more logical. Here is why I think this may be so. The behaviour you report looks suspiciously like behaviour I have seen on computers in the past when their internal battery died. When a computer is switch off it has an internal battery to delivery just enough power to maintain some internal storage of things like its internal clock—that
-
Re "be able to add a value on ad hoc basis". If the list uses custom values you can check the Allow editing of value list option in the data inspector.
-
I've only just read your post, but since no one has replied in 13 days perhaps a few thoughts even at this late stage may assist your thinking. 1. In the first part you say the the auditions db is flat—I assume that means it has just one table. Then in part three you ask about "adding a database with another 16 tables". My first thought was that you could simply add the auditions table to the larger db, but this bit confused me somewhat. 2. Again, I was a little confused by your statement: "the ID is their school ID". I trust this simply means the ID that is used to identify them w
-
Changing text field to date field
keywords replied to Jondb's topic in Calculation Engine (Define Fields)
Two points: 1. I think the key is to make sure you have the data in an acceptable date format BEFORE you switch the field type. For example, if the text data in the field is 27/02/14 FM will easily convert it to that same date, but if it is 270214, FM will leave it as is. 2. A variation on the formula given by hbrendel is to make use of the Self function in place of the field name in your data replacement formula, and also use "/" as per your original post, instead of "–". 3. The formula will only deliver a correct result if the text date is six digits (ie. 270214). Result will be wro -
"I should find all records where the Selections field has both the Options1 and Options2 checkboxes checked" You could try using the exact match operator (==) in your Find and see if that makes a difference.
-
Why don't you try just stretching the fields using the field toggle handles on the inspector. That way, if you do happen to have Bartholomew whatsisname and the field is too small to display it, you can stretch the window and thus the field so that it can be viewed. Just a thought.
- 8 replies
-
- field formatting
- field behavior
- (and 3 more)