Jump to content
The site is updated on a beta version. Maintenance tasks are running so search and index may not function at this time. ×

Joost Miltenburg

Members
  • Content Count

    159
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About Joost Miltenburg

  • Rank
    member
  • Birthday 06/16/1974

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    Utrecht

FileMaker Experience

  • Skill Level
    Expert
  • FM Application
    19

Platform Environment

  • OS Platform
    Mac
  • OS Version
    10.15

FileMaker Partner

  • Certification
    7
    8
    9
    10
    11
    12
    13

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. Hi Wim, yes, I understood already that external to internal routing is something we have to tackle as well, but our IT-guy can fix the routing in the router. Again, thanks for your time and response.
  2. Hi Wim, First of all, thanks for the reply. I was thinking about servers not showing because of multiple sources using same ports or network traffic from production or test hindering the other server. But if I read your answer correctly, we don't need to worry about issues like those. Kind regards, Joost
  3. LS, We are migrating to a new FileMaker Server 19 as the hardware is getting old. Currently we are running Server 14 with web services enabled. How can I setup the new server to run both on the same network? Can I change the ports without any problem? Thanks for the input!
  4. L.S., I am getting this error as well, but from a GTRR script step. I turns out the relationship was invalid as the field on the right side of relationship ( child ) was using an unstored calculation. Hopefully, this is useful to someone. Kind regards, Joost
  5. Hi! using FM18v3 I defined an import, update using key with option :add remaining. Odd enough, when running the import for the first time, the key field remains empty. (Unexpected) As a result the second time I run the script I get new records, but now the keyfieldfield is filled. (Expected) The third time the import also runs as expected ( no new records ). I fixed this by defining this script in FM18 using an if. Eventually, I launched FM17 and re-did the script. Now it works like it should. Anyone else can replicate this? Kind regards,
  6. not(IsEmpty(Trim( ind_sent_to_website ))) For both the view and edit options. Very basis, IMHO.
  7. Hi All, I added security to limit the DataAPI user from accessing certain records, with the limited option. I tested this while running these files on my HD no server. Worked like a charm. After moving the files to FMServer the DataAPI account can access all record in the table all of a sudden. Any thoughts as to why this is happening? Kind regards, Joost
  8. LS, Does anyone know how to configure parallels so that files are visible in the host? I can see the files on my own mac running paralles, but other machines in the network only see the host. No files show up. TIA, Joost
  9. LS, A client recently ran a Windows update and since then FM returns error -1 ( unkown error ) when using the sendmail scriptstep. I tried reïnstalling FMPro (32bit) ( can't install 64bit ), because of 32bit Outlook. That didn't help. Any ideas?
  10. LS, Is your client using MS Outlook, 32-bits? With Outlook this is a known issue, when used with FMPro 64-bit. If this is the case, you can just install FMPro 32-bit. HTH
  11. LS, We are running FMserver with custom webpublishing. People can connect to the website and see pictures that are attached to propositions. The pictures folder is located on the FMServer as well and getting pretty big now. So we are complating moving the folder ( it is currently located in htdocs ( running on a Mac )). How do we reconfigure FMServer/apache to do this? Kind regards....
  12. Be sure to check for unique occurrence names across the solution.
  13. In my original post I mentioned that an insert from URL and then parsing the whole thing takes about 4 minutes on the client. Importing with xml/xsl takes me about 5 seconds to get the exact same result
  14. So, a little update. I created the xsl in about 10 minutes, but that is skill. Now for the import via import records, type xml using the xsl. The import took about 5 seconds for a slightly larger data set. So JSON with parsing vs importing with xml/xsl isn't in the same ballpark. I would even go so far as to call it a different game.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.