Jump to content

DMDewey

Members
  • Posts

    10
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About DMDewey

  • Birthday 03/20/1979

DMDewey's Achievements

Rookie

Rookie (2/14)

  • First Post
  • Collaborator
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. I got it. Thanks for the info. I knew I was doing something wrong. I wanted to make sure that I wasn't doing too many extra steps when I could've done something much simpler. The search script I created will suffice this time, but I'll bookmark this thread just in case I run into a similar problem. BTW...I've used your Timekeeping database as a model for my own time tracking system. I'll have to send you a copy of it for you to check out. It's got a webviewer with a javascript counter to show you the time elapsed.
  2. I guess relating a calculation to a global doesn't work so I made a script to search the inventory and it works how I need it to. Now I just need to make a script to add it the Inventory_Used table.. Is there a better possible way to search the portal? portal_filtering_mod.zip
  3. I've read that portal filtering works by using the relationship so I use a patterncount calculation to take the search string and compare it to the inventory name. It'll return a "1" or more if it is found so I use this calculation field to relate it to a global constant ("1") in another table occurance of the same table. So if the search string is found, then at least a "1" is returned for that field and I use a greater than or equal operator in the relationship. There must be something I'm doing wrong. I don't really know if I'm performing a legal operation.
  4. It's my first time to actually try this. I have an art database with three tables Artwork, Inventory (supplies) and Inventory Used. In the Artwork layout, I'm trying to show two portals: One with all the Inventory items with a search box and the other will have a list of inventory items used to create the art. I'm having a problem searching the portal using a global constant ("1") compared to a pattern count of the search string. I have all three tables related with two extra instances of the Inventory table used to list all of the items and filter them (creating a total of 4 relationships). I'm trying to take the search string and use it in a patterncount calculation that searches the inventory name and then use that calculation field to relate it to a constant of "1". Does this make sense? Hopefully the sample file will make sense. Any help would be greatly appreciated. portal_filtering.zip
  5. Actually it may have been just some fluke or the fact I was using 8.5 advanced up until last week. The webviewer seems to be quicker in v9.0 as well. I tested it and it works BOTH ways. I'm glad I'm wrong because I wouldn't want to have to remember do that for javascript.
  6. Reactor is a plugin that handles interaction with Javascript/Ajax from within a webviewer. I don't like using plugins, but this one works well on Macs. I know its a little jumpy on the Windows platform, but what isn't. It seems FileMaker for Windows was almost an afterthought sometimes. Thanks for that example above, comment, I previously thought that data urls didn't allow anything interactive like javascript, *REMOVED TO AVOID CONFUSING PEOPLE*
  7. I was a PC user since the days of Windows 3.1 and DOS and I recently switched to Mac in 2005. That is how I first got a chance to play around with a demo of FM. I didn't really spend that much time with it because I was too busy getting acquainted with OSX. About six months ago a potential job prospect considered knowledge of FM a plus so I downloaded the trial version (of 8.5) and a couple weeks after that, I purchased FileMaker 8.5 Advanced because I was so delighted with the features - particularly the ability to make cross-platform runtime solutions. Since that time, I've used FM to make a few databases that I use on a regular basis. I don't picture myself ever going back to Access. No offense was meant with the terms "hacks" and "quirks". As a graphic designer, practically every bit of software I've encountered had something that could be described as quirks and I would have to research workarounds or hacks - particulary with web design using css.
  8. Yeah.....hopefully FM will fix some of its annoying quirks in v9. Overall, I still prefer FM to MS Access even though the latter is much more mature.
  9. I appreciate the quick reply, LaRetta. Your solution is something similar to what I've tried, but not exactly like that. It is a little bit of a hack, but knowing that is how other people would solve it makes me feel better about using it. You're absolutely right about the unstored field. I deleted it. It was just something I had seen used in FM's built-in "Lending Library". Perhaps I could also just use the field as a button that takes you to another layout to choose the contact (based on certain criteria) and then when a person clicks on a button next to the name, the vender_id field from the products table is populated with the corresponding id. Anyway, your solution is something I'll probably use somewhere as it works pretty much how I need it to. I've changed the validation for the field to make sure that the id actually exists before allowing it to be recorded. -Matthew
  10. I'm trying to link up two tables with ids without the user ever seeing an id. I have two tables: PRODUCT product_id - number - Auto-enter Serial, Unique product_name - text vender_id - number vender_name - calculation - Unstored, =contact::contact_name CONTACT contact_id - number - Auto-enter Serial, Unique contact_name - text I have a relationship defined as follows: vender_id = contact_id The layout for the product has the name and the vender name (vender_id). The vender name is a dropdown list that uses a value list showing two different fields (contact_id and contact_name from contact table). The vender field will show the list of names when you choose them, but shows the id otherwise. I've tried to use an unstored lookup and then define the same value list for that field to choose from. This makes me feel really stupid for not being able to figure this out. I know I could probably design the database where you click on the vender name and it takes you to another form with a list of names and then your choice modifies the vender id field, but I really just want to be able to use a dropdown list. simple_relationships.fp7.zip
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.