Jump to content
rt916

Unable to perform Find function on a drop down list value

Recommended Posts

rt916    0

I assist with a FMP 11 database that manages projects and related data, about 10,000 projects currently.

I setup a new tool that tracks a ADL requirement with a simple YES/NO drop down value list. Users choose if the project requires ADL tracking by selecting YES/NO, and we have a layout that lists all 10,000 projects with the ADL requirement that shows YES, NO or empty value. This layout also shows lots of other project records that are searchable without error.

I am trying to perform a Find on this layout to display all values with YES selected, or NO selected. The appropriate relationship is setup on the graph so my list shows all 10,000 projects, and other records that are searchable, but my YES/NO value list gives me a  "No records match the find criteria." Before I write a script with a button I am testing the find function steps first, and I keep getting the same error.

I open the layout, click show all (10,000) records.

I click Find then click the ADL Requirement and click either YES or NO.

I click Perform Find and get the No records match this criteria error.

This seems to be a very simple operation, to search records in the database, and for the life of me I cannot find why it isn't working!!

Any help is much appreciated, thanks in advance!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
comment    1,381
4 minutes ago, rt916 said:

The appropriate relationship is setup on the graph so my list shows all 10,000 projects,

I don't see what this has to do with the problem at hand. If you are on layout of Projects and the ADL field is a field defined in the Projects table, then no relationship is relevant here. 

 

9 minutes ago, rt916 said:

I open the layout, click show all (10,000) records.

I click Find then click the ADL Requirement and click either YES or NO.

I click Perform Find and get the No records match this criteria error.

Could you post a file showing the problem? If you can reproduce the problem in a new file, so much better. Otherwise post a copy of your existing file after removing everything that's irrelevant to the problem (one table, one field and one value list should be all it takes).

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
rt916    0

I wanted to update this thread in case someone finds it and runs into a similar problem. It ended up being a problem with my relationship graph, where I was matching the wrong field to the related table, thus the search was not performing a query on the correct field. If you run into this, check your relationship diagram and verify you have the correct related field tied together. Hope that helps!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now


  • Similar Content

    • By muskee
      Hi guys,
      Would appreciate your help. I have a database for a university, basically I have students that enroll to a subject and can either : win, homologate, fail, or cancel the subject.
      I must make a report that shows every student that has failed, canceled or hasn't seen certain subject. The catch is that if the student has seen the subject two or more times and for example the first time he failed it but the second time he won it, that student appears on the report even though he shouldn't because he won the subject on a second try.
      So, how can I make a report that excludes a student that has enrolled a subject more than one time and has failed and won that same subject?
       
       
    • By mizpurplest
      I am building a custom solution for my company that tries to replicate the functionality people are used to in a series of text-based documents. One of the things I have been asked to produce is a method for highlighting specific text on screen when viewing historic log notes.  In some cases, we have decades of notes for a customer, so simply looking through those records is impractical, and the users want to be able to view the found note in the context of other notes, chronologically, so I can't just have them perform a find for the specific text. 
      Is there a way to jump to the specific row of a portal that contains a specific text string without actually filtering the portal results?
       
      I am using Filemaker Pro 15 on Windows 7.
    • By Tony Morosco
      I'm a botanist, and the tables I am working with are for tracking botanical garden collections. The data represents plants in the garden, and the plants are tagged and show up in the database.  The tables I am working with were created in FMP 7, and I'd like to open them up in FMP 11 (or later.)  The system hasn't been used in years, but still has valuable information.
      One of the tables is giving me problems using the FMP convert and recover commands.
      These tables are all inter-related.  The main table is the Accessions table, which contains records for all of one kind of plant, from the same source, received on the same date.  It is basically a museum standard.
      The other tables are related to each other through this one main table.  The Species table is related to the locations table through the Accessions table. 
      (i.e.  table A relates to table C through the table B, the intermediary)  
      From the Locations table, we can't see the the species information unless the accessions table is present.
      When issuing the open command on the main table to convert the database to FMP 11, I get the message:
      "Accessions.fmp7" is damaged and cannot be opened.  Use the Recover command to recover this file. When using the Recover command from v. 11, I get another message:
      WARNING: problems were detected while recovering the database.  Please review the Recover.log file to see where problems were found and their severity.  The recovered file should NOT be used going forward; copy only the most recent work from it into a backup copy of the original file. Recovery results:   File blocks: scanned and rebuilt 563 blocks, dropped 214 invalid data blocks.   Schema: scanned fields and tables, 1 items modified   Structure: scanned; 1 items modified   Field indexes: rebuilt  
      Opening the recovered database, there are only three records present.  There should be hundreds.  So obviously I am looking on how to wrangle this database open.
      I've attached the log file here, as well as the database structure map.  
      The other files have converted just fine.  But since the main table won't open, we are kind of stuck.
      I can share the files with you through Dropbox or whatever, if needed.
      Please let me know any thoughts you have, either basic or advanced.  And ask for any clarifications or additional questions.   :-)  
      Thanks!
      -Tony
      Recover.log

    • By Gently Does It
      I am working in a biology lab and have developed several basic databases using filemaker 11 to help the lab organise their stocks of chemicals and so on. We have a fairly onerous excel sheet that we have to fill out for registering certain new reagents we make with the regulatory authorities and as these are a pain to use, they are not filled out regularly enough. I would like to simplify this for everyone by making a filemaker form/database that will automatically fill out as much detail as possible.


       
      The data in question is that when we clone a piece of DNA we need to insert this into several different DNA vectors that are used for different things. Whenever this one particular piece of DNA is inserted into a new vector it must be registered, so for one piece of DNA there may be , lets say 6 individual entries in the database, all saying more or less similar things, but just having different target vectors. I hope this isn’t already sounding to weird.


       
      I have a plan that I will have a ‘home screen’ with a field for entering the name of the DNA and then some tick boxes for each of the common target vectors. What I would like is that all my colleagues will need to do is tick the boxes for the vectors they want to clone the DNA into and filemaker will then automatically populate a new entry for each of the vectors specifically for the new DNA they have cloned. As I have some basic experience, but am admittedly very limited in my scripting knowledge, I am unsure as to how best to do this. Would it be best to have a button next to each of the vectors instead of a tick box that would run a script that would take the name of the DNA in the field and then make a new entry based on the associated vector? If so can anyone suggest how this would be best organised. I am guessing I only need a single table with two layouts, one for the home screen and one for viewing all the entries.


       
      I’m sorry if this seems a bit convoluted.


       
       

      Thanks for any help.

    • By ggt667
      Is there a way in AppleScript to trap if the connection is lost and have an AppleScript act on this?
      At the risk of asking and answering myself( AppleScript below )
      repeat tell application "FileMaker Pro" try database "db" on error do shell script "sudo shutdown -r now" with administrator privileges end try end tell delay 59 -- 59 secs end repeat  
×

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.