Jump to content

Defragmentation Result -- is this normal?


K1200

This topic is 6124 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Under Windows XP, I defragmented a drive containing a 70Mb FileMaker runtime application and was surprised by an entry in the results of "Files that did not defragment: APP.fp7 1643 fragments 70Mb". This represents over 60% of the area that remained fragmented on the drive.

Can anyone shed some light on this aspect of managing single-user runtimes? Is this normal for FileMaker Apps? Does FileMaker allocate space in physical blocks under XP, not logical ones? Is there a technique to minimize fragmentation? Is this a valid instance to occasionally use Compact or Optimize File?

Any insights will be appreciated.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks for the response.

I've been reluctant to use Compact or Optimize because of the "bad press" they've received over the years. I guess I'll backup and then try Compact this week -- and then defragment again -- to see if I get a better end result.

Regarding total free space for defragmentation, that hasn't been a problem so far. I'm at 17 percent free, beyond the recommended 15%.

I guess my one question remains: what would be a good plan for managing a single-user runtime from month to month? Given, for example, that a user adds a few hundred records each month, would running Compact on a monthly basis be a good recommendation? I realize the single-user environment is less demanding in these respects, but I'm concerned of the cumulative effect of doing nothing for months on end.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks, Fenton. I hadn't yet considered that. After reading up on the choices, I'll be adding the Compacted option to my scripted Save A Copy backup operation. From the user's standpoint, I suppose they can occasionally replace the database portion of the runtime with the most recent backup (this app uses the 2-file separation model) if conserving space is a concern.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is 6124 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.