Jump to content
  • entries
    51
  • comments
    8
  • views
    19,871

Interesting quirk for unrelated field reference in field definition


David Jondreau

746 views

 Share

One apparent limitation of using ExSQL() in the separation model is that you can’t use unrelated tables in a field definition. So you’d need to related all your tables to one another.

I just discovered that you can bypass that limitation simply by wrapping your statement in a Let() and declaring a variable that includes wrapping a field in the GetFieldName() function.

So the expression:
Let( field = unrelated::table ; field )
returns an error.

However,
Let( gfn = GetFieldName ( unrelated::table ) ; field = unrelated::table ; field )
does not.

It doesn’t even have to be a field from an unrelated table. Interesting and hopefully helpful.


View the full article

 Share

0 Comments


Recommended Comments

There are no comments to display.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.