GAM

Based upon the memory available on the computer where Filemaker Server is Running, the maximun allowed cache size is: 800MB. RAM Reserved for databases: 64 MB Cache Flush Distribution interval: 00:01(hh:mm)

Why the function Save as PDF don't work using FMPA11 with XenApp 5 when save in the local pc (not in Server XenApp)? Using FMP11 on XenApp 5 on Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition SP2 64 bits Work: Exporting to Exel in the local PC. OK. Work: Save As PDF in the local account on the XenApp Server OK Don't Work: Save As PDF in the local PC. FAILED Using FMPA10 all work perfectrly on XenApp 5 on Windows Server 2008 Standard Edition SP2 64 bits Work: Exporting to Exel in the local PC. OK. Work: Save As PDF in the local account on the XenApp Server OK Don't Work: Save As PDF in the local PC. OK NOTE FMP10 and FMP11 are installed on the same server.

Why FMSA11 consumes almost all the RAM even when no users are connected.? Filemaker Server causes the use of 98% of RAM. When I stop the FileMaker Server service the RAM back to normal using only between 20% and 30% of the RAM My FMSA11 run on a virtual machine with Windows Server 2008 Standard Service Pack 2 64 bits and two processors Intel Xeon of 3.0GHz and 4.00 GB of RAM Any ideas?

FMP8.5 (GUI.FP7 )-->| INTERNET |-->|| My FireWall ||--> My FMS8 (DATA.FP7)? Or FMP8.5 (GUI.FP7 )-->(WAN Accelerator)-->| INTERNET |-->|| My FireWall ||-->(WAN Accelerator)--> My FMS8 (DATA.FP7)? Again, manage GUI.FP7 is very complex, security, accounts access, privileges on the records, layouts, scripts, operations to calculate or enable visibility and editing of records, apart from a free number of GUIs.FP7 throughout hand. The remote desktop connection(RDC) is not a substantial solution, and requires a new agent server RDC ($$$) and manage these accesses.

More than one FMS + Synchronizer data? It is possible, but is lost management in the interface changes (Layouts), Scripts, Custom functions, Plug-ins, access accounts, and tables Overall, it becomes a big problem. any idea using an unique BD in an unique FM Server with FMP Clients remotes?

Filemaker (Pro & Server) so far has been designed for LANs, can be applied in WAN (Internet), but performance is very slow, if it wished to have a solution with FileMaker with remote access in different sites Geographical, ie your databases can be accessed from USA, Spain, China, so as to make this application will behave as if it were on a LAN, any idea? with FMP8.5 (Clients) and FMS8???

The performace on WAN or Internet to access remote to the databases shared is too slow, FileMaker have any alternative to accelerate the trafic fmnet? **************************** There is any solution to improve the speed of Filemaker on Internet at 200%, 300% or more? **************************** Accelerate by Blue Coat(Match 5), Packeteer, Riverbed, Other? **************************** it's possible do the experience on LAN equal to the WAN(internet) to access remote? **************************** A solution based on FileMaker is designed to work best only on LAN? **************************** the performace on WAN or Internet to access remote to the databases shared is too slow, FileMaker have any alternative to accelerate the trafic fmnet? **************************** There is any solution to improve the speed of Filemaker on Internet at 200%, 300% or more? **************************** Accelerate by Blue Coat(Match 5), Packeteer, Riverbed, Other? **************************** it's possible do the experience on LAN equal to the WAN(internet) to access remote? **************************** A solution based on FileMaker is designed to work best only on LAN? **************************** Filemaker thinks to target solutions based on FileMaker Pro to work on the Internet? When 2008, 2009, 2010?