Jump to content
Claris Engage 2025 - March 25-26 Austin Texas ×

This topic is 7746 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

  • Newbies
Posted

Is there any way to give regular users a way to create and modify simple merge documnets? Anyway to fake it?

The only thing I could think of is a kludge of nested Substitute and GetField functions, but it's not as dynamic as I would like.

Posted

How dynamic do you want it? The nested substitute function method works pretty well. You can't do anything about text styles though. But, you can give the user the ability to create any body text and use any data fields in any position. What kind of features are you looking for?

  • Newbies
Posted

If you put the 'raw' merg text into a global field, and have placemarkers for the fields, using square brackets (or some such) around them to differentiate them from the rest of the text, a merge can be totally dynamic.

You have a 'compose' layout and can include a bunch of buttons to auto-insert field placmarkers at the current cursor position in the field. Plus you can have placemarkers for current date and time and other system variables.

Then you simply need a corresponding script to generate the output text (preferably to a related 'letters log' file).

No need to use 'GetField'. No need to nest. Just use a series of Set Field steps one after the other, each dealing with the insertion of a single field in place of the corresponding placemarker. It's dead easy to set up and easy to maintain.

Set Field [ LetterLog::BodyText, gLetterOne ]

Set Field [ LetterLog::BodyText, Substitute(LetterLog::BodyText, "[FirstName]", FirstName ]

Set Field [ LetterLog::BodyText, Substitute(LetterLog::BodyText, "[LastName]", LastName ]

Set Field [ LetterLog::BodyText, Substitute(LetterLog::BodyText, "[DateDue]", DateDue ]

Set Field [ LetterLog::BodyText, Substitute(LetterLog::BodyText, "[CurrentDate]", DateToText(Status(CurrentDate)) ]

etc...

Looks pretty dynamic to me. wink.gif

  • 8 months later...
  • Newbies
Posted

I hoped to find a way to somehow use the FieldNames(dbname, "") design function to somehow accomplish this. I'm still looking.

Nested/Sequential substitute is adequate, but some function/calc that would replace any occurrence of any field name with the contents of that field would make it truly dynamic and maintenance free.

This topic is 7746 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.