April 7, 200421 yr I am trying to reduce a relationship from an inherited database. I think I have an idea, but I wanted to see what others thought. I have table A, with two fields. The fields are E and S [A:E and A:S]. Field E has redundant names. Field S is dependent on field E, meaning that I can't have S without E. As it stands now, each record is composed of a single E and a single S. Therefore, i could say that the combination of E and S give me a primary key. Would it be wise to break the E field into its own table (forcing a new Primiary key) and creating new tables for S. I assume that this would mean that I would have to make new relationships for S. But, I would reduce the current one table. An I making sense? FileMaker Version: 6 Platform: Windows XP
April 7, 200421 yr A, E, S? It's hard to think in these terms. Do you have real field names you can give them?
April 7, 200421 yr Author table A can be called ASSOCIATES field E can be called TYPE field S can be called SUBTYPE Thanks
Create an account or sign in to comment