Jump to content
Claris Engage 2025 - March 25-26 Austin Texas ×
The Claris Museum: The Vault of FileMaker Antiquities at Claris Engage 2025! ×

This topic is 7275 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Posted

Thanks for those whom have answer my posts already, but I have one "underlying" question that might solve my mystery.

True / False: If you acquire an image file (by using script - Insert Picture) without selecting the REFERENCE check box, the image file will be stored on the computer you acquire the image. OR would the image be stored onto the FM5 database assuming we are dealing with FM5 server and clients machine.

Same True/False question except this time we SELECT the REFERENCE check box.

I'm having a hard time figuring out where the image really reside and more importantly is how I can allow client machine to "import" the image so that EVERYBODY on the network (access to FM5 on the network) can view the image file.

One last question is that does it matter if I use the "Insert Picture" or "Insert Object" script command to import an image? The code I'm working with now has it as "Insert Object" with LINK check box check by which a client machine is "linking" the image file to each FM5 record. The problem arises when a client machine accessing each member but CAN'T open up the image file (prompting an error of Bad Link or similar)

Thanks in advance and I hope you gurus out there can shed some light for this Young Grasshopper.

Posted

If you import the image NOT as reference then it is in the database and everybody can see it. But depending on how many images/how big this can eventually become a problem with file size.

If you import the image as reference and the image resides on a shared drive - NOT the server database drive - then everybody that has the share mounted can see it.

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted

Personally, I prefer packing the images right into the database.

It bulks up the database, but the images don't get lost that way.

You might get a slight performance boost, but it would be negligible.

This topic is 7275 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.