Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

FMForums.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Cross-product ( the "X" operator) question

Featured Replies

The cross-product operator (choosing the "X" instead of "=" or less than , greater than, etc.) maps all records of one table to all records of another, right?

If so, why do we need to pick a field on each side of the relationship? Shouldn't this cross-product relation be from table-to-table?

For clarity, I tend to just choose a serial number or primary key field, but wouldn't it be cleaner and clearer if the cross-product relationship didn't require you to specify key fields?

  • Author

The cross-product operator (choosing the "X" instead of "=" or less than , greater than, etc.) maps all records of one table to all records of another, right?

If so, why do we need to pick a field on each side of the relationship? Shouldn't this cross-product relation be from table-to-table?

For clarity, I tend to just choose a serial number or primary key field, but wouldn't it be cleaner and clearer if the cross-product relationship didn't require you to specify key fields?

  • Author

The cross-product operator (choosing the "X" instead of "=" or less than , greater than, etc.) maps all records of one table to all records of another, right?

If so, why do we need to pick a field on each side of the relationship? Shouldn't this cross-product relation be from table-to-table?

For clarity, I tend to just choose a serial number or primary key field, but wouldn't it be cleaner and clearer if the cross-product relationship didn't require you to specify key fields?

In principle yes. But: The user interface for "define database" and "edit relationship" would not be as consistent as it is now; one would need to have an additional dialog box (e.g. for "delete related records in this table when a record is deleted in the other table" (did you try out with the cross operator? All records are deleted)). Now you can combine several relation operators within one dialog box only.

Martin

In principle yes. But: The user interface for "define database" and "edit relationship" would not be as consistent as it is now; one would need to have an additional dialog box (e.g. for "delete related records in this table when a record is deleted in the other table" (did you try out with the cross operator? All records are deleted)). Now you can combine several relation operators within one dialog box only.

Martin

In principle yes. But: The user interface for "define database" and "edit relationship" would not be as consistent as it is now; one would need to have an additional dialog box (e.g. for "delete related records in this table when a record is deleted in the other table" (did you try out with the cross operator? All records are deleted)). Now you can combine several relation operators within one dialog box only.

Martin

Create an account or sign in to comment

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Account

Navigation

Search

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.