smudge11 Posted September 24, 2001 Posted September 24, 2001 Hi, Is it possible for the result of one relationship to become the master for another relationship? I wish to be able to select a client from a list, that then limits the choices I have for contacts. This much I have working. Now I want the individual contact information to be displayed relating to the contact name, not the client. Can I make multi-level relationships?
LiveOak Posted September 24, 2001 Posted September 24, 2001 It kind of depends upon what you mean by "result". A relationship cannot be based upon a key field that is or includes related fields. The left side of a relationship can contain a global field, but he right side can't. -bd
smudge11 Posted September 24, 2001 Author Posted September 24, 2001 What I have is a client field that is a menu list. Once you choose the client, a relationship defines a value list of contacts at that company. What I need is for the choice of contact name to then display the correct phone number and email for that person. I guess I can't use the contact person as the master for a new relationship, so how do I relate to the necessary information about each individual person?
LiveOak Posted September 24, 2001 Posted September 24, 2001 Drop down lists can show two fields and enter the data from the first field. Make the first field the Contact ID and the second the name. The Contact ID will be entered and used to trigger the related display of the phone number. -bd [ September 24, 2001: Message edited by: LiveOak ]
smudge11 Posted September 24, 2001 Author Posted September 24, 2001 I'm confused, or possibly not explainig myself correctly. I don't see how the two fields of the value list helps me. I have 3 fields. Field one is a list. A choice in filed one defines the value list by relationship for field two. What I need is a choice from field two to define field three. If I create the client ID field, it still is derived from a relationship and cannot be the master for the relationship for the third field. It's looking like I have to use two fields for the value list of field one, which makes my list much longer. I was hoping to avoid this.
LiveOak Posted September 25, 2001 Posted September 25, 2001 Not correct. A value list based upon a relationship does not mean that the value selected can't be used in a relationship. The validity of the the relationship goes with the field, not how the value entered into the field was selected. The validity of the relationship based upon Client ID does not depend how the value for Client ID was selected. -bd
Recommended Posts
This topic is 8529 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now