genious Posted March 29, 2006 Posted March 29, 2006 I am having a terrible problem. I have a very simple database which will have 2 images for every record. I have 6 records and my datbase is up to 80MB but the pictures are a maximum of 1mb each. I have not deleted any records so I can not understand where all the fat has come from. This can not be right. When I am up to 1000 records my file would be rediculously large. Is there something I can do rather than storing a reference, I used to do this in the past but always ended up with more problems than advantages.
Reed Posted March 29, 2006 Posted March 29, 2006 Images in container fields do take up a bit more space than their actual file size, but this sounds a little bit excessive. Have you previously had a lot more than 6 records with images that have since been deleted? Sometimes empty space is not reclaimed and the file is fragmented. If you use the file maintenance utility in 8 advanced or if you use save a copy as... (compressed) the file size should go down. If you're worried about your main file getting too large, and you don't want to use references, you could create a separate file that only holds the container data and relate those records to the ones in your main file.
genious Posted March 29, 2006 Author Posted March 29, 2006 I found the problem embarressing as it is. I was looking at the wrong file! I have it sorted now, I am not used to FM7/8 I must be allowing myself to get confused. Thanks for the help
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6867 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now