gephry Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 I have a feeling I know the answer already, but I'm hoping there's an easy way around this: Can I create a relationship with a specific repetition of a repeating field? What I surmise is, NO....that it will include all repetitions in that relationship, correct? Is there a way around it then? I'd like to match only specific repetitions rather than all repetitions. Reason being, I want a specific relationship to each repetition and only that repetition. And I don't want to have separate fields for the data in each repetition...it just gets cumbersome. But I have a feeling that's my only option, huh? Sorry if I'm causing any confusion (I tend to do that here).
Ender Posted October 4, 2006 Posted October 4, 2006 I don't want to have separate fields for the data in each repetition...it just gets cumbersome. But I have a feeling that's my only option, huh? Yes, unless you're willing to go with a relational design. You could define a table that replaces your repeating field, then include a field with information that makes each desired related record link to your target table.
bruceR Posted October 5, 2006 Posted October 5, 2006 FileMaker has been relational for 10 years and repeating fields are almost always a poor choice. Get rid of the repeating fields and go to a relational design.
gephry Posted October 5, 2006 Author Posted October 5, 2006 Ender -- Mmm, yea. That's what I originally was doing, although doing the relationship within the current table. And that is what was getting messy. Lots of fields within that table. I'll do the relationship with a new table. Thanks to the both of you!
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6682 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now