Help pls...

[Ditto]

Does anyobody has an approximate in the development time with CDML compared with XML? I mean, how much time can i save if development is done using CDML rather than XML? Any factors to consider?

What are the advantages of using CDML or XML?

Thanks.

[Garry Claridge]

The advantages of CDML could be control and multi-browser support.

Garry

[iBib]

CDML is serverside and doesn't require the user to have special browsers or plug-ins to handle the webpages Filemaker creates (or you create using CDML).

XML on the other hand is not that supported by a lot of browsers, but from what I have experienced: XML is a lot more durable than CDML. But since XML is a more structured/strict language than CDML, it can be harder to begin programming your site.

[iBib]

Oh, I forgot...

When you start using XML, you don't want to switch back to older languages since it's just a little kick-*** language from the other side...

Seriously: XML is a very good language, CDML is not. But CDML is easy to use, XML is not.

You can create stunning things with CDML, just a couple of days after you first start using it. That's not exactly the situation with XML.