Jump to content
Claris Engage 2025 - March 25-26 Austin Texas ×

Performance gains from intel based macs on server based solutions


This topic is 6102 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have a several databases hosted on a dedicated web based server running FM Server Advanced.

Most of these databases used to be part of a larger solution. I had effectively created a production manager for my cabinetshop with many related tables. Task management was linked to a client database which was linked to a contractor database, etc. Most of this worked pretty good on a local area network.

When I moved it to the web (so that it was accessible from more locations) the solution started to run extremely slow. After about 100 records everytime you made a keystroke you would be confronted with the spinning beach ball of death.

I ended up simplifying this solution greatly. Instead of relying on a lot of relationships and calculated fields I turned it into a series of standalone databases and used buttons to navigate between them.

My primary client station in the shop is a non-intel based Imac.

It occurred to me this morning that filemaker 9 was optimized to run faster on intel based machines.

So now I am curious, [color:red]Would switching the client station to an intel mac make much of a performance difference for a web based server? I would dearly love to link some of these DBs back together if I can make the speed happen.

Any ideas?,

Jarvis.

Posted

This is too general a question to give a definitive answer.

A number of factors influence WAN based "speed" of a FIleMaker Pro database when accessed by the FMP client. Some of these are also applicable to accessing the files via a web browser:

1. Dedicated server

2. Correct hard drive type selection

3. Amount of RAM installed on Server. 4 GB is optimal. This is particularly true for IWP.

4. Server OS

5. Free disk space on the FMP client machine. Have at least 1 GB free.

6. Amount of RAM on client reserved as cache. 12 MB is optimal.

7. File architecture--especially important.

8. Network typology.

9. Bandwidth to the web, especially levels of latency.

And so forth.

Steven

Posted

Thank you Steven.

You've saved me some money.

Jarvis

This topic is 6102 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.