jonners99 Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 I would like to know what the main changes are between filemaker server advanced 8 and version 10. Is there a big enough difference to make it worth us upgrading both software and machine it runs on?
John May - Point In Space Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 FileMaker Server 9 Advanced patched a number of stability issues in FileMaker Server 8 Advanced. Of course, 10 includes these patches as well (and perhaps more). That alone is reason enough to upgrade. - John
jonners99 Posted February 4, 2009 Author Posted February 4, 2009 So does that mean that it is less likely to corrupt our main database during a power cut? Having to copy onto a seperate machine to perform a recovery is very tedious.
John May - Point In Space Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 No, the newer versions of FMSA wouldn't make corruption on a power failure any less prevalent. The bugs fixed are with the stability of the server software itself. - John
jonners99 Posted February 4, 2009 Author Posted February 4, 2009 Ok so other than small fixes what is going to make my life better?
John May - Point In Space Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 They're more than small fixes, they are patches that keep the server from crashing in some instances, which can lead to file corruption. As to new features, I'd recommend visiting FileMaker's web site. - John
Fitch Posted February 4, 2009 Posted February 4, 2009 Server 9 introduced the new Admin Console, which makes remote admin much easier and the upload assistant makes permission problems go away. Email Notifications, ESS and PHP Site Assistant also came with 9. Last but not least, Server-Side Scripting. Now with 10 you can include in your scheduled scripts import/export and SMTP email. Plus better logging and a few other bells and whistles. So yes I'd say upgrade is worth it, especially if you're going to support FileMaker 10 clients.
Steven H. Blackwell Posted February 5, 2009 Posted February 5, 2009 o does that mean that it is less likely to corrupt our main database during a power cut? Having to copy onto a seperate machine to perform a recovery is very tedious. Why are you experiencing these power failures? Do you have a UPS installed that allows for a graceful shutdown? Recovered files should not be used going forward. They still likely contain corruption. Steven
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5769 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now