teecad Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 Hi All, I have created a solution which includes new tables to store records and along with tables of records imported from Access databases. At least one of the imported databases is not formatted in such a way that I am easily able to perform lookups based upon related match fields. I have included a sample file to illustrate my predicament. Layout "Range1" illustrates the imported database while "Range2" illustrates what I consider to be a more conventional layout. The problem is I have approximately 30,000 records in the imported database that would have to be copied several times and split up to contain one term and rate per record if I am unable to perform lookups in its present arrangement. I am requesting assistance with the possibility of creating a look up of the range of field names in the "Range1" layout just as I would match the "term" field in "Range2" in a conventional lookup table. Any assistance would be much appreciated. Thanks in advance! Test1.zip
comment Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 Why don't you import the data 5 times - each time importing the key and one of the rate columns.
teecad Posted July 13, 2010 Author Posted July 13, 2010 Thank you for the reply. I could certainly do that, but I was wondering if there was a way to create the lookup based on the "Range1" database the way it is. Also, I submitted a sample file as an example. The actual file contains columns from 100°F to 1800°F, increasing by 50°F intervals. To reproduce the table in conventional form, I would be importing, probably with loop script, approx. 30,000 records 14 times each. It definitely is an option, and it may just be what I'll eventually have to do, but I was just exploring the option of using what I already have and it would be another learned work-around in the process.
comment Posted July 13, 2010 Posted July 13, 2010 It's possible - though hardly advisable: you can use a Case() calculation with 14 tests. BTW, please update your profile as you are clearly NOT using version 6.
teecad Posted July 13, 2010 Author Posted July 13, 2010 Thank you for your comment, I guess I'll have to buckle down and update the table with repetitions of imports. Also, I apologize for the condition of my profile, thank you for calling it to my attention.
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5247 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now