bruceR Posted January 11, 2011 Posted January 11, 2011 For files on FileMaker server, simple file references seem to work best and it seems that normally you do not need to take folders into account even if they are being used. Except... I have a client with about 40 files on their server and one of them is much larger than the others. So for backup schedule purposes it has been placed in a separate folder, and it is backed up less frequently. MAIN this.fp7 that.fp7 other.fp7 FOLDER2 bigfile.fp7 All file reference for files to each other are of the form: file:this.fp7 file:that.fp7 file:other.fp7 file:bigfile.fp7 etc Never noticed the slightest problem. All files and table occurrences pointing to external tables work flawlessly. HOWEVER - tried to set up a new scheduled server script in this.fp7 that references data in bigfile.fp7 All the scripting activity is taking place in this.fp7 using table occurrences that reference the big table in bigfile.fp7 Everything works perfectly in script debugger and when running the scripts with FileMaker Pro. But the scheduled scripts will NOT not work unless the bigfile reference is changed to: file:bigfile.fp7 file:../FOLDER2/bigfile.fp7 FileMaker Server 10.0v2, MacOS Server (XServe) 10.6.5 Bruce Robertson
Steven H. Blackwell Posted January 12, 2011 Posted January 12, 2011 I have a client with about 40 files on their server and one of them is much larger than the others. So for backup schedule purposes it has been placed in a separate folder, and it is backed up less frequently. It is quite possible to exclude the one file from the regular backup process but still leave it in the same directory as the others. Just note the options for selecting files when creating a backup schedule. Steven
bruceR Posted January 13, 2011 Author Posted January 13, 2011 Thanks, I'm aware that that can be done. But I see that the same issue just came up on TechTalk. It is inconsistent behavior and should not be happening, and as far as I know is not documented.
bruceR Posted January 14, 2011 Author Posted January 14, 2011 It *is* a problem. Quoting from Techtalk: Good morning, Bruce! Thank you, thank you, thank you .... That did the trick;-) /Heine That's the problem. You will need to change your file references to reflect the folder structure; or go back to putting them all in one folder. Just went through exactly this scenario myself and posted about it a few days ago. Bruce Robertson Concise Design
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5061 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now