wintergreen Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Hi I'm curious as to whether it would be worth getting SMA in order to port some custom functions over as plugins. First of all, is there a performance improvement to compiling a scriptmaster plugin of a scriptmaster function (for example, the XPath function)? Secondly, if I were to take a typical filemaker custom function (such as Quicksort()), rewrite it in groovy and then compile that as a plugin, would that boost performance? Thanks
Smef Posted May 6, 2011 Posted May 6, 2011 Scriptmaster modules compiled as plugins do not need to be registered using a registration function call, and so you don't need to spend the time doing that, and so performance is improved in that way. The speed of the function you rewrite in groovy would be dependent on how efficiently you write your module, so I can't say how fast or slow it would be if you did that.
Recommended Posts
This topic is 4961 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now