Jump to content
Claris Engage 2025 - March 25-26 Austin Texas ×

This topic is 4726 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have been using FM for quite a few years now. One thing I'm disappointed in is that you cannot name relationships. I always document my own databases and use the following procedure for documenting each relationship:

The relationship is named with the table occurrences (TOs) involved in the relationship.

TO1-to-TO1

Example

Assume there are two related tables Customers and Items:

Comments

Relationship name

Customers-to-Items

TO names

Match fields

Customers::pkRecordID = Items::fkRecordID

Include TO names

Create records

Items

TO where records are created

Delete records

No

TO where records are deleted

Sort

Yes; Item name, ascending

How records are sorted

I would be interested in knowing how others document relationships so I could improve my procedure. Any suggestions and/or comments?

Sorry. I prepared the topic with a table, and it came out garbled. I'll try to attach a Word document.

I would be interested in knowing how others document relationships so I could improve my procedure. Any suggestions and/or comments?

This topic is 4726 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.