john9210 Posted December 12, 2011 Posted December 12, 2011 I have been using FM for quite a few years now. One thing I'm disappointed in is that you cannot name relationships. I always document my own databases and use the following procedure for documenting each relationship: The relationship is named with the table occurrences (TOs) involved in the relationship. TO1-to-TO1 Example Assume there are two related tables Customers and Items: Comments Relationship name Customers-to-Items TO names Match fields Customers::pkRecordID = Items::fkRecordID Include TO names Create records Items TO where records are created Delete records No TO where records are deleted Sort Yes; Item name, ascending How records are sorted I would be interested in knowing how others document relationships so I could improve my procedure. Any suggestions and/or comments? Sorry. I prepared the topic with a table, and it came out garbled. I'll try to attach a Word document. I would be interested in knowing how others document relationships so I could improve my procedure. Any suggestions and/or comments?
beverly Posted December 16, 2011 Posted December 16, 2011 Relationships.xsl.zip Yes! run the DDR and apply an XSLT with an import back into FileMaker!
Recommended Posts
This topic is 4726 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now