Jump to content

andieroid

Newbies
  • Posts

    2
  • Joined

  • Last visited

andieroid's Achievements

Newbie

Newbie (1/14)

  • First Post
  • Conversation Starter
  • Week One Done
  • One Month Later
  • One Year In

Recent Badges

0

Reputation

  1. Many thanks for this, I suspected that I may have gone about my customer database a little bit simplistically! There are actually three entry validation fields in the database, one for username, one for password the other, a concatenated field that I am currently doing the "find" on. I thought I could do more-or-less what you have suggested on the concatenated field, but you are hinting that a relationship would achieve the "exact" match that a simple "find" can't do properly? I'll have a try at the relations approach. Thanks again
  2. A while back I set up (what was meant to be...) a small protected area for our customers. Access to the site was by performing a simple "find" on the unique username and password contained in each customer record. The site has grown quite big (400 customers) and only now do I realise that the "find" will work on EITHER password or username (and worse still on any part of either). I tested it when I first set it up and I was sure it was secure (obviously I was very wrong!) I have added the html <INPUT TYPE="hidden" NAME="-op" VALUE="eq"> to the form, but the find continues to work as VALUE="cn". As you can imagine - I need to find a solution very fast or take this section offline now. Can anyone tell me how to ensure that the Web Companion performs an exact find?
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.