September 28, 200421 yr Well, I am one of those that chose to keep everything within one file. It is my first network experience and it seemed simpler (security-wise particularly). Don't yell at me!! I will probably be changing the structure to separation once I can catch my breath. In the meantime, there is one thing that FM can do that would really help. The theory of Save A Copy As ... empty clone or all records. Darned if it wouldn't be handy to choose - on a table by table basis, whether to include the records or not. I currently have a solution that is being designed (with tables being populated via migration) at home while other tables are simultaneously being hosted and used daily. To integrate the two, I have to decide whether to Clone my design without records and import all the tables from the hosted design plus manually re-import all my conversion tables - or manually delete from only the tables they are changing! I am migrating data into 14 other tables that have not changed ... but there are 20 tables that have. It will be a long night. Allow Users to select which table to Clone Empty and which to Clone with data - on a table by table basis, please FM. LaRetta
September 28, 200421 yr You could write a script that deletes the records from the tables you want and then Clone with all records... HTH Wim
September 28, 200421 yr Author That's what I'm currently doing but one table alone that needs to be deleted is 520,000 records and several are 300,000 plus; and it takes time to run this script through all appropriate tables. I know Cloning an empty file is instantaneous - indicating that FM can do it much faster than a delete script. Ah, it's just late and I'm trying to find someone to blame for my all-nighter. But I still think it would be a good idea and serve many purposes. Thanks for responding Wim. LaRetta
Create an account or sign in to comment