Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

FMForums.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

  • Author

I've been using FM4 for years and went to 6 and was pleased. I just went to 7 and things are mighty slow. My biggest problem is printing. I print wireless to a Lexmark T420. I print 100 or so bills a month and it used to be a breeze. Now when sending it to the printer it keeps pausing and I have to hit the continue button on the printer maybe half a dozen times. With 4 and 6 it was a pleasure to print.

Scrolling is also slow. Simple database, 2 entries per customer and 10 simple calculations.

I like the new features in 7 but am ready to go back to 6. Am I right in assuming 7 is overkill for small databases?

Thanks

Hutch

I've been using FM4 for years and went to 6 and was pleased. I just went to 7 and things are mighty slow. My biggest problem is printing. I print wireless to a Lexmark T420. I print 100 or so bills a month and it used to be a breeze. Now when sending it to the printer it keeps pausing and I have to hit the continue button on the printer maybe half a dozen times. With 4 and 6 it was a pleasure to print.

Scrolling is also slow. Simple database, 2 entries per customer and 10 simple calculations.

I like the new features in 7 but am ready to go back to 6. Am I right in assuming 7 is overkill for small databases?

Thanks

Hutch

  • Author

I've been using FM4 for years and went to 6 and was pleased. I just went to 7 and things are mighty slow. My biggest problem is printing. I print wireless to a Lexmark T420. I print 100 or so bills a month and it used to be a breeze. Now when sending it to the printer it keeps pausing and I have to hit the continue button on the printer maybe half a dozen times. With 4 and 6 it was a pleasure to print.

Scrolling is also slow. Simple database, 2 entries per customer and 10 simple calculations.

I like the new features in 7 but am ready to go back to 6. Am I right in assuming 7 is overkill for small databases?

Thanks

Hutch

Am I right in assuming 7 is overkill for small databases?

No I wouldn't say - Am I right that migration precuations weren't taken? Slowdowns are usually stemming from cluttered filereferencing ...but you didn't rebuild your thingy from scratch - having all databases inside one file as TO's, did you??

--sd

Am I right in assuming 7 is overkill for small databases?

No I wouldn't say - Am I right that migration precuations weren't taken? Slowdowns are usually stemming from cluttered filereferencing ...but you didn't rebuild your thingy from scratch - having all databases inside one file as TO's, did you??

--sd

Am I right in assuming 7 is overkill for small databases?

No I wouldn't say - Am I right that migration precuations weren't taken? Slowdowns are usually stemming from cluttered filereferencing ...but you didn't rebuild your thingy from scratch - having all databases inside one file as TO's, did you??

--sd

  • Author

No, 2 separate databases with 50 customers each and I keep a new one for each month, I import each month to a yearly database but don't print bills from it. About 250+ fields in each so I wouldn't want to start from scratch. When I converted, the big change was the Today function which was nothing. Moving around in 6 is snappy, 7 pause then move. Why it hangs the printer is beyond me. It shows the files spooling, the print center icon appears in the dock, files are sent and the dock icon disappears in seconds. Same as in 6 except the printer pausing all the time in 7. Takes 3.5 minutes to print 50 in 6, about 10 min in 7 and having to stand there.

Thanks

hutch

  • Author

No, 2 separate databases with 50 customers each and I keep a new one for each month, I import each month to a yearly database but don't print bills from it. About 250+ fields in each so I wouldn't want to start from scratch. When I converted, the big change was the Today function which was nothing. Moving around in 6 is snappy, 7 pause then move. Why it hangs the printer is beyond me. It shows the files spooling, the print center icon appears in the dock, files are sent and the dock icon disappears in seconds. Same as in 6 except the printer pausing all the time in 7. Takes 3.5 minutes to print 50 in 6, about 10 min in 7 and having to stand there.

Thanks

hutch

  • Author

No, 2 separate databases with 50 customers each and I keep a new one for each month, I import each month to a yearly database but don't print bills from it. About 250+ fields in each so I wouldn't want to start from scratch. When I converted, the big change was the Today function which was nothing. Moving around in 6 is snappy, 7 pause then move. Why it hangs the printer is beyond me. It shows the files spooling, the print center icon appears in the dock, files are sent and the dock icon disappears in seconds. Same as in 6 except the printer pausing all the time in 7. Takes 3.5 minutes to print 50 in 6, about 10 min in 7 and having to stand there.

Thanks

hutch

No, 2 separate databases with 50 customers each and I keep a new one for each month, I import each month to a yearly database but don't print bills from it. About 250+ fields in each so I wouldn't want to start from scratch.

250+ fields isn't particular normalized to be honest, you're probably much better off with a spreadsheed speedwise - you havn't embraced relational designs yet, have you???

A basic invoicing system consists of a customers table, Invoice table, and a lineitems table - where each of them holds approximately 7-10 fields - then do you system perhaps need some kind of sofistikation with a discountmatrix again approximately 7-10 fields but more likely 3-4. Further is a table perhaps needed for warehouse/storagelevels which is 3-4 fields ...we're talking 45 fields spread evenly over 5 tables, and not 250+ !!!

If I'm guesing wrong here are you ready for this tool:

http://www.newmillennium.com/index.php?s...y=MetadataMagic

--sd

No, 2 separate databases with 50 customers each and I keep a new one for each month, I import each month to a yearly database but don't print bills from it. About 250+ fields in each so I wouldn't want to start from scratch.

250+ fields isn't particular normalized to be honest, you're probably much better off with a spreadsheed speedwise - you havn't embraced relational designs yet, have you???

A basic invoicing system consists of a customers table, Invoice table, and a lineitems table - where each of them holds approximately 7-10 fields - then do you system perhaps need some kind of sofistikation with a discountmatrix again approximately 7-10 fields but more likely 3-4. Further is a table perhaps needed for warehouse/storagelevels which is 3-4 fields ...we're talking 45 fields spread evenly over 5 tables, and not 250+ !!!

If I'm guesing wrong here are you ready for this tool:

http://www.newmillennium.com/index.php?s...y=MetadataMagic

--sd

No, 2 separate databases with 50 customers each and I keep a new one for each month, I import each month to a yearly database but don't print bills from it. About 250+ fields in each so I wouldn't want to start from scratch.

250+ fields isn't particular normalized to be honest, you're probably much better off with a spreadsheed speedwise - you havn't embraced relational designs yet, have you???

A basic invoicing system consists of a customers table, Invoice table, and a lineitems table - where each of them holds approximately 7-10 fields - then do you system perhaps need some kind of sofistikation with a discountmatrix again approximately 7-10 fields but more likely 3-4. Further is a table perhaps needed for warehouse/storagelevels which is 3-4 fields ...we're talking 45 fields spread evenly over 5 tables, and not 250+ !!!

If I'm guesing wrong here are you ready for this tool:

http://www.newmillennium.com/index.php?s...y=MetadataMagic

--sd

  • Author

Thanks Seren,

I'm not ready for MetaData, way over my needs. I spent a couple of thousand $s before I found FMPro about 1994, it came on 3 floppys then. Been doing my billing and reports ever since and still a novice. FM6 serves me fine and if 7 is going to be such a hassle I don't need it. I could send you a copy so you could see it is pretty basic, I really don't care to put it here on the board.

Hutch

  • Author

Thanks Seren,

I'm not ready for MetaData, way over my needs. I spent a couple of thousand $s before I found FMPro about 1994, it came on 3 floppys then. Been doing my billing and reports ever since and still a novice. FM6 serves me fine and if 7 is going to be such a hassle I don't need it. I could send you a copy so you could see it is pretty basic, I really don't care to put it here on the board.

Hutch

  • Author

Thanks Seren,

I'm not ready for MetaData, way over my needs. I spent a couple of thousand $s before I found FMPro about 1994, it came on 3 floppys then. Been doing my billing and reports ever since and still a novice. FM6 serves me fine and if 7 is going to be such a hassle I don't need it. I could send you a copy so you could see it is pretty basic, I really don't care to put it here on the board.

Hutch

I could send you a copy so you could see it is pretty basic

Please do!!!

--sd

I could send you a copy so you could see it is pretty basic

Please do!!!

--sd

I could send you a copy so you could see it is pretty basic

Please do!!!

--sd

Create an account or sign in to comment

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.