Jscott Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 I had this discussion tonight with a SQL guy and was told that I was a fool to use FM because it was a snigle threaded based app. vs. SQL which is a Multi-Threaded based app. What defense can I provide to this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Søren Dyhr Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 Well IWP on FMP8SA can take a fair simultainiously sessions: Serve data simultaneously to up to 100 web-based clients, 50 ODBC/JDBC clients, and 250 FileMaker Pro 8 and 7 clients ... if thats what he's refering to, or Filemaker server can run multi-threaded over 1 to 4 cpu's. But he might have some cost/benefit issues ...some tend to use FM as prototyper for then to migrate it to mySQL/perl via: http://www.fmpromigrator.com/products/fmpro_migrator/index.html --sd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wim Decorte Posted February 6, 2006 Share Posted February 6, 2006 FileMaker Server is multi-threaded. FileMaker Pro is single-threaded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6675 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now