April 13, 200619 yr Can anyone shed some light on the difference in performance between a summary field and a sum calc field? The databases I generally work with do not have that many records and I have not seen a great performance difference. Will either work faster or slower when the record number increases? Any input will be appreciated, Thanks Mike
April 13, 200619 yr It's not really a question of performance. They each have different uses. When working with found sets, summary fields are usually used. When working with relationships, aggregate calcs are used.
Create an account or sign in to comment