cknight Posted November 14, 2006 Posted November 14, 2006 Hi all, I am now trying to do a conditional value list for my product catalog. I have a table called measurement standards so you can switch between metric and US standards and i want to create a conditional value list based off which is selected with my packaging table. Now i have tried to disect every ******* demonstration file on here and I have watched John Mark Osbornes Videos over and over and iam just not getting it. I want to know why people are using global fields and what are they doing? I would like to know how table occurances relate to the global fields and finally i would like someone to explain to me if the join table i have created is overkill and how do i create a conditional packaging valuelist based off the measurement standards valuelist. Do i need the join table? How many global fields do i need and Table Occurances? If you could look over what i have thus far and mb point me in the right direction as far as relational theory and since i am desperate could you show me in my example how to set up the conditional valuelist i talked about above. I have spent 4 12 hour days trying to get a grasp on this. I figured i could create a calculation field to do what i want without the relationships. Am I wrong thinking this? I just create 2 value lists american_packaging metric_packaging My guess would be: case( measurement_standard=1;valuelistitem(get(field);"american_packaging"; measurement_standard=2;valuelistitem(get(field);"metric_packaging" but i tried it and its not working. AHHHHH what is wrong with me.... please help :jaw: products.fp7.zip
The Shadow Posted November 15, 2006 Posted November 15, 2006 Take a look at this version of your file. I added a new field "gStandard" that you fill in with either "Metric" or "American" and do the join on that. I added a new copy of "Packaging" table to your graph to do the join to, and made a relational value list similiar to the ones you defined. Hope this helps. products.zip
cknight Posted November 15, 2006 Author Posted November 15, 2006 wow! I just figured it out today and now i see how you did it. I think i did it a little differently. Is the way i am doing it alright or should i stick with the extra table occurance and global field you have? I have attached the file to show you how i did it. Thank you so much. It so nice of people to take the time and help us ignoramous out Carlisle products.fp7_2.zip
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6583 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now