May 12, 200718 yr i attached an excel file as an example of what i am trying to achieve with FM. I need a form with two linked fields when i assign value regardless in which one the linked field has to change. Any suggestions will be appreciated Book1.zip Edited May 12, 200718 yr by Guest
May 13, 200718 yr Author here even a ms access example of what I am trying do in FM. pls note you need vba enabled. Auto-select.zip
May 13, 200718 yr One way to achieve this effect in version 3 (version 3??!!) would be to have two relationships to the Clients table - one based on Name, the other on Country. Each selection field would lookup its value from the opposite relationship.
May 13, 200718 yr Author comment, do you mean self-joining the name and country fields? i tried this and I just got more confused. pls explain further
May 13, 200718 yr It could be self-joining, or it could be from another table. I cannot say based on the information you have provided (none, really).
May 13, 200718 yr Just out of curiosity I tried to make a table where two fields were each lookups of the other. It doesn't really work how I would expect. If the record is empty, then the lookup will proceed as expected regardless of which field you populate first. But when you try to change the value of either field you cannot because the lookup is triggered and you can't even clear the values. The file I attached is from v8, but the concept should operate similarly in older versions. lookup.fp7.zip
May 14, 200718 yr Yes, you are right - it won't work that way. I tested this in version 4, and Filemaker won't even accept the definition of the second lookup. However, I am not going to agonize over this, because the more I think of the request, the less sense it makes to me. For this to work as shown (in any method), both Name and Country would have to be unique. The "correct" way would be to choose from the related records SerialID's - which could be shown with either names or countries. Then both fields could lookup from a single relationship - or they could be eliminated altogether, and replaced by the related fields.
May 15, 200718 yr Author Hi all I didn't pay attention to what version I selected. I am testing on 8.5 Thanks for all responds anyway Edited May 15, 200718 yr by Guest Removed the shouting
Create an account or sign in to comment