May 23, 200718 yr I need to create what is a union of 2 equi-joins in a single portal. Can it be done? The conditions are mutually exclusive under normal circumstances. On one side of the relationship I can select either a type OR an id. The purpose is that when I select a type, I am creating a grouping that will be assigned an id. Once I assign an id, I can only view those records in the portal by selecting it's id. Now I have to be able to edit that set assigned the id which could mean adding or removing records from that group. That means I have to be able to view the records from that ID AND distinctly the available records of that TYPE. Creating a separate portal to do this will muck up the interface and it will not be as user friendly than if I do it in a single portal. Edited May 23, 200718 yr by Guest quotes don't work in Subject line
May 23, 200718 yr I DeMorgan the expression, via a unstored calc'field: --sd Relational_OR_Challenge.zip
May 23, 200718 yr Author Thank you Søren, I'll look at that and see if I can implement it. Looks like the solution though.
May 23, 200718 yr Author Your solution effectively answer the "OR" but it does not answer the conditional. There are 3 possible lists I want. Lets say in your list everyone is Mike, Pat or Bessie. Some of these records have a last name. 1) I want to see all Bessie's that don't have a last name. 2) I want to see all last names that are Ford. It is understood that all Fords also have a first name of Bessie but I don't want to see any Bessies that don't have a last name. 3) I want to combine list 1 & 2 - All Bessie's that don't have a last name AND ALL Bessie Ford's. The problem is that 1 & 2 cancel each other out for list 3.
May 23, 200718 yr Ah! an XOR relation (pretty exiting), I have to poke down in my math litterature ...it has gone time for some family life, could you await until tomorrow. Alright you can give it try yourself meanwhile: F = ¬AxB+Ax¬B ¬ = not x = OR + = AND --sd
May 23, 200718 yr Author Take care of the family! I'll have to proceed with a 2 portal solution but it's not as elegant or user friendly so if you have a solution I'd gladly integrate it.
Create an account or sign in to comment