Newbies d_roderick Posted March 19, 2009 Newbies Posted March 19, 2009 Hi All, I'm quite rusty with Filemaker and having trouble with the following: I have 2 database files. 1. ENTRANTS 2. CODES Entrants has about 1,000 records. The records have a field named CLASS. CLASS is a related field that pulls up information in the CODES Database. I want to display a count of all Classes in a different database file. The new file will be called TASTE. e.g. record 1 - CLASS 120 record 2 - CLASS 100 record 3 - CLASS 120 record 4 - CLASS 100 record 5 - CLASS 150 sub summary results yield CLASS 100 - 2 CLASS 120 - 2 CLASS 150 - 1 There should be one record in the TASTE database for each record in the CODES database. I want to pull the sub-summary information into the TASTE database. Having difficulty getting my head around this. Many thanks in advance. d
Søren Dyhr Posted March 20, 2009 Posted March 20, 2009 The summary should preferably be done in the "many" section of relation, and then pulling data from the "one" side ... when I say preferably is it because you sometimes wish to have counts of zero... --sd
innodat Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 You can count related records based on your relationship with Count(RemoteField). Let's assume that you already have a Taste record for each possible class in your TASTE file. Let's further assume that the name of the class is stored in a field called ClassName in the TASTE table. Let's also assume that you have a Record ID field in both tables (serial number, auto entry). You should now be able to create a relationship with the following key fields: TASTE::ClassName = CLASS::Name Then all you need is a calculation in the TASTE table: TASTE::ClassName & " - " & Count (AboveRelationship::RecordID)
Søren Dyhr Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 I wouldn't advice this way without knowing the measure of records attempted summarised. http://fmforums.com/forum/showpost.php?post/313019/ --sd
innodat Posted March 23, 2009 Posted March 23, 2009 Good point. Might be too slow. The reason I pointed in this direction is, because it sounded like he needs the data in A) the remote table, and : on a regular layout in browse mode, as opposed to a report.
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5818 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now