Gunnerstudios Posted July 17, 2009 Posted July 17, 2009 (edited) Hey First I need to say thanks for Søren Dyhr to create this calendar function back in 2006.. =) Called CalcVsGenSlots CalcVsGenSlots to quickly fill you guys in here is a summary what Søren Did. with my modifications Here is following tables and relationships Relationship Events::Start_time = schedule::cSchTime Events::Date = schedule::cSchDate Table 1 (schedule) Fields cSchID, | auto enter serial cSchTime | Mod ( SlotID - 1 ; 48 ) * 30 * 60 cSchDate | Let ( [ sunday =Contacts::gDate - DayOfWeek ( Contacts::gDate ) + 1 ] ; sunday + Div ( SlotID - 1 ; 48 ) ) Table 2 (Events) Field EventID auto enter serial EventType (text) Start_time End_time Date Table 3 (contacts) Field ContactID auto enter serial cWeekDatesR gDate Name Adresses Etc... So far so good. i have modified the portals so they only show records from 08:00 - 18:00 each day. works fine. When I make an Event (Date 17.07.09) (Start_Time 08:00) (End_Time 10.00) (EventType Lunch ) It shows perfectly as and planed, it is Lunch as 08:00 but it show is end at 08:30. How can I make so EventType show until End_Time (10:00) I tried to create a new field in Schedule called cSchEnd_time, an create a relationship "Event::End_time = Schedule::cSchEnd_Time. The portales doens show any data. @@@@ I know newbe misstake.... i needed to < Time Start > Time End Please help So my second question, do you understand what i mean? Kind Regard G Edited July 17, 2009 by Guest
Gunnerstudios Posted July 17, 2009 Author Posted July 17, 2009 I sloved it.. hehe. it was a newbie misstake. see above for the answer. Thanks again to Soren for making the template for me! Worth while to look at if you are after a scheduling or a roaster
Søren Dyhr Posted July 17, 2009 Posted July 17, 2009 While I really can take the responsibility for quite a handful of templates here, are you mistaken by this particular one's origin. It stems indeed from something Comment and I debated eagerly back then, to make enough slot records to handle an forseable future or just design the solution to cater the visible slots in the most crowded layout, with a transitive key (a calc) instead of the hardwired from the prefabbed records. It's Comment's template! The difference seems near seemless in a single user version, but the negotiation in the round trips in a networked solution, and especially an IWP'ed - favours the hardwired. Hows about signing into a triple 8 IWP trial of one month and try the two approaches against each other? http://www.triple8.net/hosting_filemaker.htm --sd
comment Posted July 17, 2009 Posted July 17, 2009 Please do not link directly to files from other threads. As Søren's response makes clear, these files are demos posted in the course of a discussion, and they should be studied in that context.
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5607 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now