Jump to content

Win 2000 Client Access Licenses


Fer

This topic is 8142 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

OAM I just set up FM 5.5 on Win2000 Professional, mostly because in my organisation Professional is free but server is not.

Is it going to compromise data integrity, or just a bit of performance (I can live with non-optimal performance in this case). It's hosting <70 files to around 10 concurrent users max.

Thanks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

W2K PE is not designed to be a server OS. It is not optimized for services. FM Server 5.5 is a service. Especially with 70 files you should be running W2K Server. Performance and interaction between the OS and the service.

I haven't heard os any corruption reports, provided file sharing is off.

Old Advance Man

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree. W2000 Professional are running services fast and many of them. All of the Windows core elements are services. Definitely FM server will run faster, than on Mac OS in background.

IMHO Server is a bit more optimized.

Best advice as always is -- try that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is 8142 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.