mediaase Posted November 1, 2001 Posted November 1, 2001 I am working on a photo database and was wondering if the size of the image impacts the database. I am using the original images as the source for the thumbnail (usually 1600x1200). If file size makes FM slow down, then I will just convert all of the images to smaller jpgs and link to the original image on CD. If I convert the images down to about 2-3 inch thumbs of about 5k each, would that speed FM up?
LiveOak Posted November 1, 2001 Posted November 1, 2001 The major question is: are you storing an image or just a REFERENCE to an image. If you are storing images, you database will grow significantly with many images. If you store a reference to the image, the database will not change significantly beyond the normal growth with the addition of your other record data. -bd
mediaase Posted November 1, 2001 Author Posted November 1, 2001 I was storing an actual image....this was my reason for asking if I just make a small thumnail, would FM run better and faster....each image would never be over 5k....where as of now they are each about 300k
LiveOak Posted November 1, 2001 Posted November 1, 2001 I'm not 100% sure, but I believe the source file size should determine the amount of storage FM needs to store the image. It's an easy experiment with the same image in two sizes and a demo file with one container field. Check the file size, import the small image, check the file size, import the large image, and check the file size. -bd
Recommended Posts
This topic is 8494 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now