August 29, 201213 yr Sliding of repeating fields seems to have changed in version 12? Background v11: Layout has several clones of a repeating field, each showing a different repetition of the data. i.e.. myRepeatField[1..1], myRepeatField[2..2], myRepeatField[3..3], ... , myRepeatField[16..16] All are set to slide up and reduce enclosure. Result is white space is removed as expected. -- v12.0.1: Recreated layout in new project. Not converted from 11. Layout has several clones of a repeating field, each showing a different repetition of the data. i.e.. myRepeatField[1..1], myRepeatField[2..2], myRepeatField[3..3], ... , myRepeatField[16..16] All are set to slide up and reduce enclosure. Result is white space is not removed on myRepeatField[2..2], myRepeatField[3..3], ... , myRepeatField[16..16] Only myRepeatField[1..1] myRepeatField[1..16] works ok. Just not the other field setups? Used to? -- WTF? can anyone else duplicate this? Of course I have a project fully developed on this technique in 11 that has now changed in 12.
August 29, 201213 yr Author So in FM12 (12.0 v1 Mac), define a field that repeats 10 times. Add that field to a layout and designate the object to display only [1..1] of the repeats. Add another iteration of the field to the layout and designate the object to only display [2..2] of the repeats. Make these slide-up. The second iteration fails. Sometimes even to render at all. Making the object display [2..3] of the repeats seems ok. It's only with the singletons. ( I use this technique for a complex form that requires info between the repetitions. Worked great for everything before v12 )
August 29, 201213 yr Author No fix for this in 12.0 v2 for Mac Lion, downloaded today. If you designate a repeating field to show one repetition, starting with anything other that the 1st, the system fails to slide correctly. I will test Windows and iOS next.
August 29, 201213 yr Author FM Go for iOS v12.0.4 on iPad 2 has same failure. FM Go for iOS v11.0.1 on iPad2 works fine.
September 2, 201213 yr Author I found a work around. Using text blocks with merge fields, like this: <<myRepeatField[1]>> <<myRepeatField[2]>> These will slide and shrink correctly and will render correctly too.
Create an account or sign in to comment