Hi,

In an  Asset managment solution, do I absolutely need these tables:

Asset (e.g. HP Photosmart 102b)------< Individual Assets (e.g. HP Photosmart 102b | s/n:1234567890)---------< Transaction Items >------------Transactions   ?

 

Currently I don't have an Individual Assets table and all Individual Assets are created in Transaction Items table and a Serial number is assigned to them there.

When I sign out an Asset, I create a new Transaction and when it is returned, I flag the Transaction as VOID.

I know I have that Asset at hand if it appears only ONCE in my CURRENT Transactions. (VOID Transactions are excluded via self join)

If it appears only once it means that I have only one relative Transaction  the one that I created when I first received the item).

If I have two, it means that I reveived it and then made another Transaction (signed it out).

 

Is that a correct approach? What are possible pitfalls?

 

I know for sure that this approach is used when handling Inventory, I don't know about assets

but if feels a bit odd having this structure of mine...

 

I am a bit confused about it....

 

Thanks

Dimitris

 

 

 

 

Edited May 9, 20169 yr by Dimitrios Fkiaras
clarification of problem

Any help.... ?