I know this format below is incorrect, but it gives the idea of what I am after:

If(field1>0 & field2>0, "Yes") or

If(field1>0 & field2<1, "No") or

If(field1<0, "Empty", "")

It looks like it would work correctly, but doesn't. Does it make sense what I am trying to do?

LR

What you need is a case statement.

Case(field1>0 & field2>0, "Yes",

field1>0 & field2<1, "No",

field1<0, "Empty", "")

It allows multiple choices within a calculation. And it is easier to read.

HTH

Watch those ampersands. It should read:

code:

---

Case ( field1 > 0 and field2 > 0, "Yes",

field1 > 0 and field2 < 1, "No",

field1 < 0, "Empty" )

Note that the trailing "" (blank) is not required in a Case[] statement.

The "&" symbol is used to concatenate text strings. The "or" you had in your original calc also has a specific logical function.

Fitch. My Bad .

Wasn't focusing properly back then. Thanks for correcting for me.

You can nest a series of IF statements - but CASE is better. Using nested IFs, it would look like:

code:

---

If(field1>0 and field2>0, "Yes", If(field1>0 and field2<1, "No", If(field1<0, "Empty", "")))

Russ