Jump to content
Claris Engage 2025 - March 25-26 Austin Texas ×

Snow Leopard-Speed Increase too good to be true?


This topic is 5561 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

Posted

This doesn't look like the most active forum, but hopefully someone will share their experience.

I run an FM 10v3 database on a 2.4GHz dual core late 2008 MacBook. It runs a fairly complex looping script nightly for data acquisition involving screen scraping from an HTML source. The entire script usually takes 4.5 hours to run. After upgrading from Leopard to Snow Leopard, acquisition time has dropped to 3 hours. I know that Snow Leopard optimizes use of the dual core, but I fear this speed increase is too good to be true. I am worried that weeks from now I will find that I am missing data.

Has anyone out there had a similar experience or care to comment?

Thanks

Posted

Mine is still in the post, so it's good news to me ... although I have heard others with musical applications, not feeling anything exept the release of dearly disposable harddrive space. My guess is their tools might which ever rely heavy on Rosetta or not even are fledged for 64bits at all. Pro Tool e.g. is not going to support it yet.

--sd

Posted

It seems quite possible, given the reports of Safari performing much faster when run in 64-bit.

the release of dearly disposable harddrive space.

Real or imaginary?

http://www.macworld.com/article/142471/2009/08/snow_leopard_math.html

Posted

I like the Safari 64 bit theory given my heavy use of webviewers. However, I had my default browser set to firefox. As I understand it FM webviewer uses whichever browser is set as default, so I'm not sure that explains it.

Posted

Oh Really! I'm not sure where I read that FM uses the default browser setting.

Well then that might explain it since half of my runtime is webviewer loading.

Posted

Real or imaginary?

Good question what I've paid attention to is this:

http://www.latenitesoft.com/email/Xslimmer1.7.html

--sd

This topic is 5561 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.