July 17, 200322 yr Here's my situation. I have an unstored calculation field that's based on two conditionals. I also have an unstored Get Field calculation that grabs the other calc's data. Now, I want to have a third field (that I can index) lookup the information from the Get Field field. The problem is that one of the conditionals is based on a field from another file. And I can't figure out how to auto-force the lookup when the related field changes. In plain English, whenever the Billing Month changes on the master file, I have a sort value change in the pre-invoices file, based on whether a single charge's Billing Month matches the one from the master file: '1' if it doesn't match, and '0' if it does. I want to concatenate the pre-invoice number and this result into an indexable field, so I can display only those charges which are 'valid', i.e. whose pre-invoice number and Billing Month matches the master file's. Then I can display the valid charges for a particular pre-invoice in a portal for modification. I'll probably feel like a moron once I have the answer. But I don't want to spend too much time on development, if I can use other brains to speed it up. TIA
July 17, 200322 yr -Queue- said: The problem is that one of the conditionals is based on a field from another file. And I can't figure out how to auto-force the lookup when the related field changes. Aren't we all looking for this ? Unless this related field is brought to the Main and indexed, you will be stuck here I think. How exacly is this conditional set up ?
July 17, 200322 yr Sorry Queue, I missed the second part of your post based on whether a single charge's Billing Month matches the one from the master file: '1' if it doesn't match, and '0' if it does. I think this is the key... If only one record needs to be changed, that would simplify the process. I remember having solved that one in my Product-LineItem-Inventory using a 4th calc involving a Case Statement with the Max Function, returning the Product_ID, and getting the value looked up into an indexable field. I'll try to be more specific if I can or if you need, or if this make sense.
July 17, 200322 yr Author cSort := not BillingMonth = Master::BillingMonth or flag_delete flag_delete is manually changed, so that one is not a problem. When the Billing Month is changed, however, is when I run into issues. I supposed my alternative is to force a lookup whenever the master Billing Month is changed, but this could effect thousands of records, and I don't want to make my users wait indefinitely for it. There must be some sort of trick I can use. I'll work more on it later. Thanks, Ugo.
July 17, 200322 yr Author I should have said 'individual' instead of 'single'. Each record in the file updates its cSort field when the conditional is met. So I need to somehow reindex them all each time it changes.
July 17, 200322 yr Oh well. So I'll bookmark this thread and catch any magician True this would be a real challenge and a straight path forward.
July 17, 200322 yr JT, After reading your post again, I think I finally understood what you were into. I'm not convinced though the GetField would be of any help here, and I'm quite sure a script is the best you could get for the job. You want to display the current matching keys in a portal based upon an unstored calculation. A workaround would be to switch from a Classic Portal to a Filtered with relationship Master:t_TempIds::Related:Unique_ID with a little script. 1. Reversing your boolean c_Sort to c_Sort2 = Case(Billing Month = MasterBillingMonth,1,0) 2. Using your relationship MasterRel = MasterPreInvoiceN
Create an account or sign in to comment