Is it OK to store a Filemaker database on a server? I was told if I do not specifically install Filemaker Server the files in the database will be corrupted. There's only three users sharing it over the network.

Not a good idea. Keep the files on the same machine as FIleMaker Server.

Steven

I don't have Filemaker Server. I didn't think I'd need it for only three people on a network, do I truly need to get it? All my files will be corrupted if I don't?

There are many benefits of FileMaker server including backups, stability, etc.

While your files will not necessarily become corrupt by using Peer to Peer, it is just more risky that it can.

If you are going to use Peer to Peer, make sure you do at least the following:

1. Always open the files first on the same machine you do every day, or leave it open.

2. Make sure you close the files before making backups.

3. Turn off OS sharing access to the files.

I always recommend getting server but I understand why people would try and use Peer to Peer. That being said, I always tell people... How much is your data worth? If its not worth that much then of course you can take a more riskier route than another whose data is mission critical.

The advice regarding FM Server is good - it's the proper way to do it. But if economy is on your mind then you can still host the files through FM Pro.

It is better to have a dedicated FM Pro machine which no one uses, but you can still host through one of the existing licenses and the two other users can share the files from the primary license.

Never store the files on a server and then open through OS sharing - guaranteed disaster.