Johnny777 Posted September 2, 2008 Posted September 2, 2008 I am working on a sales database, which has two seperate sales tables (one for subscriptions and one for events), and I really need to keep these separate. The problem is I need these to both be connected to a single invoice table. The invoice table has several fields which are filled by means of a lookup but it is not possible to have them looking up the same fields in two separate tables. Is there a way around this. Many thanks for reading
Raybaudi Posted September 2, 2008 Posted September 2, 2008 I am working on a sales database, which has two seperate sales tables (one for subscriptions and one for events), and I really need to keep these separate. I think that you don't need separate sales tables... all you need is a new "type" field with two chooses.
Fitch Posted September 2, 2008 Posted September 2, 2008 I tend to agree with Daniele; however, an auto-enter calculation and the under-appreciated Lookup function might accomplish your stated goal.
Johnny777 Posted September 3, 2008 Author Posted September 3, 2008 I would prefer to keep the tables separate as different people in the office do different tasks and I just think it would be confusing to have everything in the same table. Also the subscriptions need to be regularly auto-updated. If someone could give me a little more detail re the second suggestion ie the auto-enter calculation and lookup function that would be great.
Fitch Posted September 3, 2008 Posted September 3, 2008 Defining automatic data entry The auto-enter calculation might look something like: Lookup( subscriptions::item ; events::item )
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5984 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now