Carl Smith Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 I am familiar with looping through a found set of records to find a duplicate entry but am baffled when trying the opposite - looping to "mark" the unique entries. Can anyone advise? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VICH Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 are you sorting underthe basis that you know that there is a duplicate and you want to find it or are you checking for any duplicates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl Smith Posted August 18, 2005 Author Share Posted August 18, 2005 Known duplicates exist. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VICH Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 you could have a script that does a find for the info on the duplicated records and at the end of the script have: go to record request first (or last which ever you want) set field (duplicatecheck : " " ) the trick that i use is i make a field like duplicate check that i define a valuelist to and that value list is just a typed space. then whati do is set it as a check box and just the box shows up and you tell the script to set that check box field to " " and it will put a check in there for you if that doesn't make sense email me at [email protected] and i will send you a sample file Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BobWeaver Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 Why not use the ! symbol to search for duplicates and then do a Show omitted command. Your found set will then contain only unique records. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VICH Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 i don't know if he wants to just view them or mark them for viewing them that would work great if he wants to mark automatically mine would work as well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
-Queue- Posted August 18, 2005 Share Posted August 18, 2005 If you want to mark all unique records, regardless of whether there are duplicates for them, you can create a self-relationship based on a concatenation of the fields which determine uniqueness (field1 & " " & field2 & " " & ... & " " & fieldN) and then use a calculation field of Relationship::serial = serial. All unique (original) records will then contain a 1 in this field. All duplicates will contain zero. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6680 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now