LaRetta Posted June 17, 2006 Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) Not don't you all laugh ... but I would like to view our sales trends back through the past five years with the phases of the moon. I won't go into why - some of you understand while others think I'm nuts. But to most, it comes as no surprise - my being nuts, I mean. Is there a database (with dates and percentages) or is there formulae? I suppose it would need to be based on __% of Full Moon. How would I approach such a task? UPDATE: I did find this site which might give me the data I need. I believe I would need to base it on the Customer's location (we sell around the world) thus results would be based upon their location influence (more than ours). LaRetta Edited June 17, 2006 by Guest Added update
SteveB Posted June 17, 2006 Posted June 17, 2006 As an ex-market researcher, I've graphed loads of silly stuff. I assume you'll use Excel, or some other stat pak? Try these links: http://scienceworld.wolfram.com/astronomy/LunarCycles.html or http://www.atimeforsuccess.com/articles/lunarcycles.html You're only a 'little nuts' (is that like being a little preggie?) Steve
LaRetta Posted June 17, 2006 Author Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) I assume you'll use Excel, or some other stat pak No, I hadn't even considered using any other program than FileMaker. I pictured using tables and even custom functions if necessary; joined on multi-predicate timestamp relationships and summing. If I'm going to do it, I want to consider delta-T as well; I want it accurate and rounded to full percents. Thank you for the link!! Edited June 17, 2006 by Guest
LaRetta Posted June 17, 2006 Author Posted June 17, 2006 :jester: Alright. I confess. I am totally insane. But I'm not stupid. If I see trends and spikes, you can bet I'll suggest doubling our sales force during those periods!! :laugh2:
comment Posted June 17, 2006 Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) Boy, you sure know how to pick'em. OK, this will return the lunar phase of Datefield as a fraction. It cycles from 0 to 1, with new moon being 0 and full moon returning 0.5. Due to natural variations of the lunar cycle, the calc can be off by as much as half a day. Let ( [ epoch = 730124.597661 ; synod = 29.5305888531 ] ; Mod ( Datefield - epoch ; synod ) / synod ) Make sure you also read this. Edited June 18, 2006 by Guest Fixed the epoch constant
Genx Posted June 17, 2006 Posted June 17, 2006 Hmmm, a real life use for regression analysis... Easy to do once you've got the data in excel but how on earth were you planning on doing it in FM? I enjoyed the read btw comment .
LaRetta Posted June 17, 2006 Author Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) Wow. This is incredible! There are two reasons I posed this question: 1) I will do anything (as long as it is legal and moral) to increase sales. From personal experience, I believe the entire natural realm is influenced by moon, sun, season, electromagnetic and gravitational pulls. I am intrigued by these correlations. Dogs may not bite more on a full moon but did anyone ever consider that they may bite more on waning gibbous at 61% during August at the equator? The fact that results are unpredictable simply means we humans haven't devised the proper tests yet (in my opinion). I'm not implying that *I* could devise proper tests ... only that I refuse to discount possibilities. 2) I simply want to understand the mathematics and principles required to produce this type of analysis by doing it. What a world THIS has opened up for me. Hubble and Plate Tectonics move over! I can find no function in Excel which even comes close but I think I've figured synod - "On average, the synodic period is 29 days, 12 hours, 44 minutes and 3 seconds long." But epoch is throwing me. The Unix epoch is 00:00:00 UTC on January 1, 1970 so you don't mean that. Julian epoch (current standard) is J2000.0 (noon on 1/1/2000). Your epoch produces approx. noon on 1/6/2000, right? Could you tell me more about your formula? I realize gravitational pull and geoid come into play ... is that what you are accounting for - those TT and TDT shifts? Or leap seconds or? And thank you so much, Michael!! LaRetta Edited June 17, 2006 by Guest Changed a few words
LaRetta Posted June 17, 2006 Author Posted June 17, 2006 (edited) ...no more significant tonight than on any other night of the year, according to scientific reviews of the theory that the full moon alters the way humans and wildlife behave. It seems that we haven't told the oceans full of marine life which follow reproduction cycles dependent entirely upon the moon's cycle, ie, tidal action. Whether the behavior is inherited or learned, we are all creatures of nature. And maybe my horses run the fields during evening of full moon only because they can see better - but they nonetheless run!! Even wolves howl at full moons. Why? So they can see what they are howling at? Thanks for indugling my peculiarity with this request. :wink2: Edited June 17, 2006 by Guest Corrected quote
Genx Posted June 17, 2006 Posted June 17, 2006 I wasn't implying for you to try and get the data in excel, i was implying that after you have extracted it you might consider using the regression data analysis within excel on the data that you calculate in FM to try and see how appropriate your model is by at least looking at the r square value - implying of course that was some sort of linear relationship between your two variables... and even if there wasn't you might be able to isolate some other type of non-linear function by looking at the regression plot.
comment Posted June 18, 2006 Posted June 18, 2006 Your epoch produces approx. noon on 1/6/2000, right? It was supposed to be Jan 6,2000 14:20:37.9104, but I've made a mistake. Fixed now. As for your question, you've got to start the cycle somewhere. The moon does not run on Unix, so if you want the calc to roll back to 0 at new moon, you need to start your epoch at a new moon. From what I've found, that seems to be the agreed starting point for computing the AVERAGE synodic lunar period - even though the actual new moon on that very day occured some 4 hours later.
Stuart Taylor Posted October 29, 2006 Posted October 29, 2006 just a little point ... would the 4 hours be accounted for if it was london and not the US/NY that the starting point of the full moon was based on. seems like the right time difference.
comment Posted October 29, 2006 Posted October 29, 2006 No. The formula above is actually based on UTC (what used to be Greenwich time). Properly, it needs adjustment to local time, but since it is only an estimate anyway, it doesn't matter much. The 4 hours are accounted for by the natural variations of the lunar cycle. The formula computes the position of the given date in an AVERAGE lunar cycle. Any PARTICULAR cycle may vary from the average by up to 14 hours. It just so happened that the cycle was off by 4 hours on Jan 6, 2000.
Recommended Posts
This topic is 6661 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now