April 20, 201213 yr I'm not sure the best way to articulate my question, but here is a rude attempt... In the attached sample you will see "Style ( A )" and "Style ( B )" Both styles may be correct under proper circumstances, I'm trying to learn what these circumstances are. Both Style ( A ) and ( B ) only illustrate two tables, ProjectsTable and AssignmentTable. Style ( A ) only has one MAIN table occurrence per table in the same TOG. In this style UI layouts would only feed off - PRJ~PARENT PROJECTS - PRJ~CHILD ASSIGNMENTS Style ( B ) sets up a TOG for ea. table. The result in this example it twice table occurences. In this style UI layouts would only feed off - PRJ~PARENT PROJECTS - ASM~ASSIGNMENTS Both styles only use two table occurrences to feed the UI. Ha! Any help or direction on this would be much appreciated. THANKS!
April 20, 201213 yr I do B which seems to more closely resemble Anchor-Buoy. Basically, all my layouts are based on an anchor TO of a TOG. It's been said that it's slower. However, I'd name mine: PRJ -> prj_ASSGN ASSGN -> assgn_PROJ and if I were creating a relationship for just active assignments: PRJ -> prj_ASSGN~active Lots of artlcles, blogs, etc. about methodologies for the relationship graph. <Cue *comment (Michael) here for opposing opinion>
April 20, 201213 yr Author I have been using the Anchor-Buoy system. (Did not know it was called this, but now I do!) This system does at time seem to be overkill, and I could see how it may run slower. But it has been easy for me to follow and develop in. If Style ( B ) is call Anchor-Bouy, what is ( A ) Style called? I think when I first started building databases I used A-style. A fellow developer viewed some of my work and suggested I use the anchor-bouy style and I never looked back... until now. I like the idea of less TO's and a faster running system, but don't know. THANKS!
April 21, 201213 yr For a thorough discussion of RG methodologies, I'd suggest buying Ray Cologon's FMPro Bible (still relevant).
April 21, 201213 yr If Style ( B ) is call Anchor-Bouy, what is ( A ) Style called? Simple? --- See also: https://fmdev.filemaker.com/servlet/JiveServlet/download/1113-2-1172/approaches_to_graph_modeling_en.pdf
April 21, 201213 yr I find anchor-buoy more confusing but some developers find it easier to work in. I think its personal choice but if you want fast and lean, go A.
April 23, 201213 yr Author All this is great! I will do some reading, etc... I'm going to make a few practice files using, lol, simple/best practice TOG style. Thank you all for chiming in!
Create an account or sign in to comment