Jump to content
View in the app

A better way to browse. Learn more.

FMForums.com

A full-screen app on your home screen with push notifications, badges and more.

To install this app on iOS and iPadOS
  1. Tap the Share icon in Safari
  2. Scroll the menu and tap Add to Home Screen.
  3. Tap Add in the top-right corner.
To install this app on Android
  1. Tap the 3-dot menu (⋮) in the top-right corner of the browser.
  2. Tap Add to Home screen or Install app.
  3. Confirm by tapping Install.

Featured Replies

Hello,

I have a Employee_Table that holds records of employees including their Employee_Code.  I have a Employee_Codes value list being generated from the Employee_Code field.

Employees are users of the system and log into the system with a limited privileges set to view and edit their own record, no other records.

I have a Meetings_Table related to the Employee_Table in which employees record meetings.  One of the fields to be filled in is a Meetings record that uses the Employee_Code value list - from which I want the user to be able to select from any current employee's Employee_Code.

The problem is, that they only see their own Employee_Code in the value list.  This is obviously because they only have privileges to view their own record - but how do I get around this problem so that they can see a list with all Employee codes?

Thanks for any help

Ben

Edited by benmort81

Well, you have conflicting requirements here: on the one hand, you don't want a user to see any of the other users' records. On the other hand, you do want him/her to see all of them, when they look at the value list.

I believe you have two options here;

  1. Allow the access to other users' records and disallow field access to all fields, except the fields participating in the value list. However, this will also prevent users from editing their own records.
     
  2. Split the users table into two, with a one-to-one relationship between them. Let the "main" table hold the fields participating in the value list, and place all the other fields in the "sub" table with limited access.

 

 

  • Author

Thank you comment.

I was actually trying out something similar to option 2 when you posted.  Although I created a sub table with just one field with a copy of the Employee_Code and made this have all access.

It seems to work - is there any downside in having the access to table/sub-table this way around?

Thanks,

Ben

is there any downside in having the access to table/sub-table this way around?

​There is the downside of added complexity. And there's more layout work for you to do. I cannot think of any functionality that will be affected by this, if that's what you mean.

Create an account or sign in to comment

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.

Configure browser push notifications

Chrome (Android)
  1. Tap the lock icon next to the address bar.
  2. Tap Permissions → Notifications.
  3. Adjust your preference.
Chrome (Desktop)
  1. Click the padlock icon in the address bar.
  2. Select Site settings.
  3. Find Notifications and adjust your preference.