Jump to content

Table of Updates Updating Calculations


Recommended Posts

Hi All, 

So my ambitious database is coming on well, and in particular thanks to Comment in this forum!

I'm on to the final chapter of impossibilities and the current one is below, which I don't really know how to start. 

So I have a table of information, which has what I would call an 'original' piece of data, a number.  

Each month, that number gets updated, on a monthly basis, at the end of each month - the idea being that you can see things in a shapshot of the present, and in the past if required. So when you add Record in the Numbers Update Table and select the Company, it replaces the 'old number' with the new number, and on it goes. 

There would be a Calculation which takes the 'new number' to work out the difference from the original number. 

In the ordinary course of things, where there are multiple fields in the same table, I'd use a Get List Values calculation - but because the 'new' number is being added each time a Record is created - I'm a bit stumped how to go about this. 

To give an example of what I'm looking for:

Numbers Update Table

Company Month Number
Company A March 12
Company A April 3
Company A May 5


Companies Table

Company Original Number Particular Month Number Difference Calc
Company A 100 as per reference from Record  
Company B 200 as per reference from Record  

 

So in essence, the Difference calc would show, for Company A in March, 103 in April and so forth. 

How would I go about this? 

Thanks!

N

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Replies 6
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Posts

You can sort the records in their own table (or in a portal) in any order you like, accidentally or on purpose, without affecting the results returned by Last(). Last() works over a relationship and d

This is somewhat confusing. I think you want to use the Last() function to get values from the most recent related record in the Numbers table. Note that this assumes records are entered in chronological order and that the relationship is not sorted.

---
P.S. I would recommend storing the year alongside the month. Or simply make the field a Date field and store the date of the first or last (or any) day of the relevant month.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Thank you for this. 

Surprisingly I have put it together and seems to be working well! 

To this more precise, and to avoid any sorting issues, can I change the Last() to add a Time and Date, so it gets the 'true last - how would I amend that calculation to include a Time/Date? 

Thanks!

N

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sorry,

So at the moment we are using Last() based on the sorted records. 

Is there a calculation I could use along the lines of Last + Date, so if the Records were accidentally sorted,  it will still find the Last be referencing the date as the 'most recent' date? 

Link to post
Share on other sites
43 minutes ago, Neil Scrivener said:

if the Records were accidentally sorted,

You can sort the records in their own table (or in a portal) in any order you like, accidentally or on purpose, without affecting the results returned by Last(). Last() works over a relationship and depends solely on the sort order you have set up in the definition of the relationship. As long as the relationship is not defined to have a sort order, Last() will return the value from the most recently created related record. This is why I said: 

19 hours ago, comment said:

this assumes records are entered in chronological order and that the relationship is not sorted.

Note that if you wanted, you could define the relationship to sort the related records in reverse creation (or chronological) order. In such case, you could get the value from the most recent record by a simple reference to the field. But this takes extra processing which might not be justified if you only need to extract one or two values.

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Similar Content

    • By GAltanis
      Dear users,
      I have three tables for three relevant layouts. Each one has separate table and tables are related with only one field.
      The scope is to show on the 2nd and 3rd layout the records that related with the 1st one. Here are some screen shots with what I need to do. Actually, I need to have on the seconf layout ("Orders from suppliers") the related records from the first one ("Suppliers list")
      Thank you thank you
      Giorgos

       

    • By epatrick
      I find it odd that FileMaker is so intuitive yet hides access to the file name of the data source during importing. It looks like the only way I have found based on posts on the forum is to import the Data Source file as a reference into a container field. That is an extra step that shouldn't have to be done since FileMaker sees the Source file name during multiple points in the import process. Here are three dialogs where it's seen during import. There has to be a way to use the input file name with some kind of Get Function.  Please help!

    • By 34South
      I previously used ODBC Manager (32 bit)  to great success importing data directly from Filemaker Server to JMP. I recently upgraded to Catalina (MacOS 10.15.5) and knew that one of the casualties would be this ODBC utility. I downloaded the 64 bit ODBC manager from Actual Technologies and successfully installed it but get the following message when trying to open an FM database from within the ODBC interface in JMP:
      dlopen(/Library/ODBC/FileMaker ODBC.bundle/Contents/MacOS/fmodbc.so, 6): image not found
      I have navigated to Actual Technologies' web site believing I should download an ODBC driver but this comes at a hefty price tag, especially when converted to my local currency. Given the increasing costs of maintenance contracts and SSL certificates I had hoped to avoid further expenditure. Do I really need this and is there an alternative?
    • By droid
      I've been saving various files - mostly pdfs - in FM container fields, for years. A script triggered by clicking in the field allowed the field to be exported for viewing.
      Recently I upgraded to FM18, and now when I click in the field, I'm told "container fields cannot be exported"!
      Is there a new way that I should be doing this? Thanks.
    • By ggt667
      I can ping my PDF document server from Terminal, I can connect to the PDF document server from all browsers apart from Safari, my default web browser is FireFox, I also tried to change to Chromium and Opera as the default web browser. WebViewer has the same symptoms as Safari, server not found.
      $ ping -nc 1 document PING document (10.0.0.7): 56 data bytes 64 bytes from 10.0.0.7: icmp_seq=0 ttl=64 time=0.002 ms --- document ping statistics --- 1 packets transmitted, 1 packets received, 0.0% packet loss round-trip min/avg/max/stddev = 0.002/0.002/0.002/0.000 ms FileMaker says ’Couldnot connect to the server.’
       
      The issues is easily solved by creating a new MacOS X user, and log in to that user, however I would rather like to fix the current user not having to migrate all other application settings. Is there some dns cache specific to Web Viewer and Safari?
  • Who Viewed the Topic


×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.