Jump to content

It works fine!


jepar
 Share

This topic is 7213 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Recommended Posts

quote:

Originally posted by jepar:

I run FMPro unlimited AND FMPro Server on the same box and it just rocks.

THERE ARE NO RULES except: do you get the performace you need?

There is one issue, to get the best performance, each one needs to be the foremost application. Obviously this cannot happen.

However, if you like the performance you are getting, then all the best to you!

------------------

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Kurt Knippel

Consultant

Database Resources

mailto:[email protected]

http://www.database-resources.com

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 1 year later...

If you like two 500MHz servers with a TCP/IP stack in between, then it's great. But just think that for the same price, you can run a dual 867MHz! I did a benchmark and with the specs above: it is 75% faster on the dual-processor machine.

The info about "frontmost application" is just b/s. Just nice (service) the two applications. Did you know tha "manframe" servers do run everything on the same "box"?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

quote:

Originally posted by captkurt:

There is one issue, to get the best performance, each one needs to be the foremost application. Obviously this cannot happen.


Not on Mac OS smile.gif" border="0 Server is faceless service on PC. On the other hand why server and Unlimited? Only if server is serving network of Clients and also Unlimited for HTTP access. PCs are datacrunching machines and if data are OK and not being corrupted, power of current machines and OS will yield great throughput for FileMaker.

Anatoli loyal Apple and PC user smile.gif" border="0

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why both? Simple because I have many power users with fat clients and data entry or remote folks with browsers! You see, server has more options to manage connexions that regular FM PRO.

Have you tried it on OS X? Can you nice the two?

JF loyal MAC, PC & LINUX user!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This topic is 7213 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Similar Content

    • By MTGriz
      Anyone else have this happen to them? Running an NT 4 sp6a box (256 MB RAMM, dual Celeron 400s) with FMPro 5 Unlimited, Web Connector to IIS SSL, Web Companion, and every week or so the FMPro quits on me. The app. has 9999k cache and is set to save every hour or when necessary. Any guesses at the problem? Don't think it is hardware ...
    • By cmbhatt
      I would like to install FM Pro 5 and FM pro unlimmited on 1 box. However, I want to only use the FM pro Unlimited for the web companant. Is this possible? If it isn't why wouldn't it, since only thing is being used is the FM Pro unlimited web componant.
    • By pengil2k
      OK,
      I've looked several places for this info and have been frustrated to no end. Can someone please tell me how to start and stop a database remotely (via the web) when using FMPro 5 Unlimited and the Web Companion!!!
    • By Pingry
      Can you run Server and Unlimited on one physical machine?
      We need to serve a number of databases to internal users plus some of them to the web. We currently have a variety of FM Pro 3.x & 4.x clients connecting to a FM Pro 4 machine (_not_ 4 Server) that has the databases shared out and the Web Companion enabled. But we need the multi-threading of FM Server and also want to upgrade to 5.
      Do we now need two physical servers, or can we stick with just one?
      The server in question is a B&W G3 with 256 MB of RAM, ample disk space, etc. so we're not as worried about the machine's ability to handle both but of both software products to be able to co-exist.
    • By puterco
      I have published my database using CDML pages and I want each web address field to act as a link witch goes directly to the address contained in the field. Example of the HTML code on the search results page:
      [FMP-FIELD: email] *how can I link this field to act as "mailto://(value in the field)"

      [FMP-FIELD:web-address] *how can I link this to act as "http://(value in the field)"
      Any help will be highly appreciated the dead line for these pages were yesterday and I need to get these features online as soon as possible. Thanks...
  • Who Viewed the Topic

    2 members have viewed this topic:
    Kenya Smith Ziegenhagen  Goetch 
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.