Mandu Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 What is the easiest way to compute the highest serial number in a column, in FM10? The serial numbers are of the form P-000002 - that is, fixed-width integer with alpha prefix (thus unusable by the max() function). If sort / goto record is the only way, so be it - just thought there might be a better way. Thanks, Chap
Aussie John Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 Without going into detail you could strip out the "P-" and use the remainder in the MAX function.
Raybaudi Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 ...thus unusable by the max() function). Hi what about using the Min ( ) function ? Try this calculation: "P-" & Right ( "000000" & Abs ( Min ( YourSerial ) ) ; 6 ) Note that this will work ONLY if your serial is always in the format: P-nnnnnn
comment Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 Min ( YourSerial ) I don't think that's a valid expression (unless YourSerial is a repeating field). My impression is that OP wants the highest serial number in a found set, and cannot use a summary field for this. We need to know if the prefix character is always a single "P".
Raybaudi Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 I don't think that's a valid expression (unless YourSerial is a repeating field). My impression is that OP wants the highest serial number in a found set, and cannot use a summary field for this. We need to know if the prefix character is always a single "P". YourSerial was an abbreviation for a self-related field, commonly used for the Summary functions, but you are right... it is better to specify: "P-" & Right ( "000000" & Abs ( Min ( CartesianSelfJoin::YourSerial ) ) ; 6 ) He said that cannot use the Max( ) function, so I think that he needs the max from all the records.
comment Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 Well. if you have a x self-join, you could sort it by the serial, descending. Then SelfJoin::YourSerial would be the answer.
Raybaudi Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 Of couse, your answers are always the best :)
bcooney Posted January 21, 2011 Posted January 21, 2011 No warning that calculating keys can be error-prone, guys? Seems like that's what the OP is doing..
Recommended Posts
This topic is 5113 days old. Please don't post here. Open a new topic instead.
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now